Details

    • Technical task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      sihara found this issue.

      When using NAT on a setup, it appears like the wrong NID is used:

      peer 1: 192.168.122.135 (NAT: 10.128.13.120)

      (lib-move.c:1790:lnet_handle_send()) TRACE: 192.168.122.135@tcp(192.168.122.135@tcp:<?>) -> 10.128.13.130@tcp(10.128.13.130@tcp:10.128.13.130@tcp) : GET try# 0
      

      peer2: 10.128.13.130

      (lib-move.c:4302:lnet_parse()) TRACE: 10.128.13.130@tcp(10.128.13.130@tcp) <- 10.128.13.120@tcp : GET - for me
      
      (lib-move.c:1858:lnet_handle_send()) TRACE: 10.128.13.130@tcp(10.128.13.130@tcp:10.128.13.130@tcp) -> 10.128.13.120@tcp(10.128.13.120@tcp:10.128.13.120@tcp)
      

      peer1:

      :(lib-move.c:4236:lnet_parse()) TRACE: 10.128.13.120@tcp(192.168.122.135@tcp) <- 10.128.13.130@tcp : REPLY - routed
      

      It appears like the NID is of the node changes some where along the line.
      LNet shouldn't care about NAT in this case and should work.

      Attachments

        Activity

          [LU-13565] LNet socklnd with NAT is not working properly

          People

            ashehata Amir Shehata (Inactive)
            ashehata Amir Shehata (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: