Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-2547

test: recovery-small test_24a, test_24b: multiop didn't fail fsync: rc 0

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.9.0
    • Lustre 2.3.0, Lustre 2.4.0
    • Server: 2.1.3-1nasS, centos 6.3, 2.6.32_279.2.1.el6
      Client: 2.3.0-1nasC, sles11sp2, 3.0.42_0.7.3
      1 mds, 2 oss, 2 clients.
      Test was run from service331.
    • 3
    • 5971

    Description

      == recovery-small test 24a: fsync error (should return error) ======================================== 23:15:59 (1356678959)
      multiop /mnt/nbp0-1/d0.recovery-small/d24/f.recovery-small.24a vOwy_wyc
      TMPPIPE=/tmp/multiop_open_wait_pipe.9556
      fail_loc=0x0
      Connected clients:
      service331
      service331
      service332
      recovery-small test_24a: @@@@@@ IGNORE (bz5494): multiop didn't fail fsync: rc 0

      test_logs tarball is attached: recovery-small.24a.tgz

      Attachments

        Activity

          [LU-2547] test: recovery-small test_24a, test_24b: multiop didn't fail fsync: rc 0

          Please close this ticket since the test was marked "always_except".

          jaylan Jay Lan (Inactive) added a comment - Please close this ticket since the test was marked "always_except".

          recovery-small test_24a and test_24b are being skipped, the problem was not actually fixed.

          adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - recovery-small test_24a and test_24b are being skipped, the problem was not actually fixed.
          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - Patch for b2_4 http://review.whamcloud.com/7424
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Landed for 2.5

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Landed for 2.5
          bfaccini Bruno Faccini (Inactive) added a comment - Got an occurrence with recovery-small/test_24b during https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f43c1ffc-e4ad-11e2-a950-52540035b04c . When will http://review.whamcloud.com/6587 land ?
          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - - edited

          Patch to EXCEPT 24b also for ZFS
          http://review.whamcloud.com/6587

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - - edited Patch to EXCEPT 24b also for ZFS http://review.whamcloud.com/6587

          It looked like a patch was landed but I saw a zfs fail today that looked exactly like this.

          https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f425e1a6-bc12-11e2-b013-52540035b04c

          keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - It looked like a patch was landed but I saw a zfs fail today that looked exactly like this. https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f425e1a6-bc12-11e2-b013-52540035b04c

          EXCEPT this test for zfs
          http://review.whamcloud.com/6119

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - EXCEPT this test for zfs http://review.whamcloud.com/6119

          This hasn't failed with ldiskfs in 4wks, but is failing over 50% of the time with zfs.

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - This hasn't failed with ldiskfs in 4wks, but is failing over 50% of the time with zfs.

          Jay, Sorry, that's a link to a failing autotest run.

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - Jay, Sorry, that's a link to a failing autotest run.

          Nathaniel, is the above link for me to read? I can not access that link.

          jaylan Jay Lan (Inactive) added a comment - Nathaniel, is the above link for me to read? I can not access that link.

          People

            niu Niu Yawei (Inactive)
            jaylan Jay Lan (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: