Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-2547

test: recovery-small test_24a, test_24b: multiop didn't fail fsync: rc 0

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.9.0
    • Lustre 2.3.0, Lustre 2.4.0
    • Server: 2.1.3-1nasS, centos 6.3, 2.6.32_279.2.1.el6
      Client: 2.3.0-1nasC, sles11sp2, 3.0.42_0.7.3
      1 mds, 2 oss, 2 clients.
      Test was run from service331.
    • 3
    • 5971

    Description

      == recovery-small test 24a: fsync error (should return error) ======================================== 23:15:59 (1356678959)
      multiop /mnt/nbp0-1/d0.recovery-small/d24/f.recovery-small.24a vOwy_wyc
      TMPPIPE=/tmp/multiop_open_wait_pipe.9556
      fail_loc=0x0
      Connected clients:
      service331
      service331
      service332
      recovery-small test_24a: @@@@@@ IGNORE (bz5494): multiop didn't fail fsync: rc 0

      test_logs tarball is attached: recovery-small.24a.tgz

      Attachments

        Activity

          [LU-2547] test: recovery-small test_24a, test_24b: multiop didn't fail fsync: rc 0
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Niu

          Can you please check to see what needs to happen to get this test re-enabled?

          Thanks

          Peter

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Niu Can you please check to see what needs to happen to get this test re-enabled? Thanks Peter
          adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - - edited

          The whole point of the always_except label is that it means this test is being skipped, but the original bug has not actually been fixed. This ticket shouldn't be closed until the original problem is fixed (lack of error return to userspace on fsync) and the test is removed from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list in recovery-small.sh. I verified that this test is still being skipped, but only for ZFS MDT.

          adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - - edited The whole point of the always_except label is that it means this test is being skipped, but the original bug has not actually been fixed. This ticket shouldn't be closed until the original problem is fixed (lack of error return to userspace on fsync) and the test is removed from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list in recovery-small.sh. I verified that this test is still being skipped, but only for ZFS MDT.
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          ok Jay

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - ok Jay
          jaylan Jay Lan (Inactive) added a comment -

          Please close this ticket since the test was marked "always_except".

          jaylan Jay Lan (Inactive) added a comment - Please close this ticket since the test was marked "always_except".
          adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment -

          recovery-small test_24a and test_24b are being skipped, the problem was not actually fixed.

          adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - recovery-small test_24a and test_24b are being skipped, the problem was not actually fixed.
          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment -

          Patch for b2_4 http://review.whamcloud.com/7424

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - Patch for b2_4 http://review.whamcloud.com/7424
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Landed for 2.5

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Landed for 2.5
          bfaccini Bruno Faccini (Inactive) added a comment -

          Got an occurrence with recovery-small/test_24b during https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f43c1ffc-e4ad-11e2-a950-52540035b04c.
          When will http://review.whamcloud.com/6587 land ?

          bfaccini Bruno Faccini (Inactive) added a comment - Got an occurrence with recovery-small/test_24b during https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f43c1ffc-e4ad-11e2-a950-52540035b04c . When will http://review.whamcloud.com/6587 land ?
          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - - edited

          Patch to EXCEPT 24b also for ZFS
          http://review.whamcloud.com/6587

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - - edited Patch to EXCEPT 24b also for ZFS http://review.whamcloud.com/6587
          keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment -

          It looked like a patch was landed but I saw a zfs fail today that looked exactly like this.

          https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f425e1a6-bc12-11e2-b013-52540035b04c

          keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - It looked like a patch was landed but I saw a zfs fail today that looked exactly like this. https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f425e1a6-bc12-11e2-b013-52540035b04c
          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment -

          EXCEPT this test for zfs
          http://review.whamcloud.com/6119

          utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - EXCEPT this test for zfs http://review.whamcloud.com/6119

          People

            niu Niu Yawei (Inactive)
            jaylan Jay Lan (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: