Details
-
Technical task
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Critical
-
Lustre 2.5.0
-
9919
Description
In the restore case of hsm_cdt_request_completed(), if the copytool returned success but the layout swap fails then we get an unreadable file with HS_RELEASED clear but LOV_PATTERN_F_RELEASED set.
Perhaps the new HSM attributes should be applied to the volatile object before layout swap, and hsm_swap_layouts() should call mo_swap_layouts() with SWAP_LAYOUTS_MDS_HSM set.
Attachments
Activity
Ok thanks Andreas, I understand now that I need to take care of this because it is also under my responsibility, if a patch is required for earlier versions, to either create+push a new patch for each other versions or ask Oleg to cherry-pick the original patch for each other versions.
I don't know why but I thought that the patch integration/release decision was done by other people (you, Oleg, Peter, …), this may simply be you are doing this verification work very requently and do the job for lazy guys like me!!
Bruno, the patch was marked as affecting the 2.5.0 release. I'm just going through patches that have landed to master and trying to see which ones need to be landed for 2.5.1 that have not been landed there, since that is the long-term maintenance release. If you are closing a but then you should consider if it is fixing a problem that is serious and may affect earlier versions of Lustre and should land on the maintenance release. In many cases, Oleg can cherry-pick the patch directly to b2_5 without putting it through Gerrit/Jenkins/autotest again, but he needs to know to do this.
Hello Andreas,
I am sorry if I missed to do something here, to be honest actually I mainly focus to get the patch done for the branch where problem has been reported. But then should I create a new patch version for each affected version listed?
Patch was only landed to master and not b2_5. In the future, this type of patch should be cherry-picked to b2_5 so that it is fixed in the maintenance release.
patch http://review.whamcloud.com/7631 has landed. Closing.
Andreas, you b2_5 patch for this ticket at http://review.whamcloud.com/9212, has found a flaw in sanity-hsm/test_12o (from original patch http://review.whamcloud.com/7631 from this ticket too !!) during auto-tests session.
This new problem is tracked within
LU-4613where I already pushed a patch to master (http://review.whamcloud.com/9235), since #7631 has already landed to master, but what should we do for the b2_5 version you just pushed ?