Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3878

sanity-benchmark test fsx: Bus error

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Not a Bug
    • Major
    • None
    • Lustre 2.4.1, Lustre 2.5.0, Lustre 2.6.0
    • None

    • Lustre build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/44/ (2.4.1 RC1)
      Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64 + FC18/x86_64 (Server + Client)
    • 3
    • 10059

    Description

      sanity-benchmark test fsx failed as follows:

      == sanity-benchmark test fsx: fsx ==================================================================== 22:15:58 (1378185358)
      debug=0
      Using: fsx -c 50 -p 1000 -S 29278 -P /tmp -l 206139         -N 100000  /mnt/lustre/f0.fsxfile
      Chance of close/open is 1 in 50
      Seed set to 29278
      truncating to largest ever: 0xd3af
      /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity-benchmark.sh: line 186: 12471 Bus error               $CMD
       sanity-benchmark test_fsx: @@@@@@ FAIL: fsx failed 
      

      Maloo report: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/becb9218-14ef-11e3-ac48-52540035b04c

      This is a regression on Lustre b2_4 branch.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-3878] sanity-benchmark test fsx: Bus error
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Here is the search result on Maloo: http://tinyurl.com/ozo5c7a The failure occurred not only on zfs and b2_4, but also on ldiskfs and master/b2_5: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/87757614-44d1-11e3-8c03-52540035b04c https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6f3d0b5e-4cc7-11e3-826a-52540035b04c https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/2582fa8c-3bbf-11e3-b062-52540035b04c
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

            Is this only happening on zfs?

            Only on b2_4, but not on master?

            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - Is this only happening on zfs? Only on b2_4, but not on master?
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Lustre build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/47/
            Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64
            FSTYPE=zfs

            sanity-benchmark test fsx hit the same failure again:
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5d2a22d4-43a9-11e3-942a-52540035b04c

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Lustre build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/47/ Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64 FSTYPE=zfs sanity-benchmark test fsx hit the same failure again: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5d2a22d4-43a9-11e3-942a-52540035b04c
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            After patch http://review.whamcloud.com/7481 was reverted from Lustre b2_4 branch, the failure did not occur on Lustre 2.4.1 RC2.

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - After patch http://review.whamcloud.com/7481 was reverted from Lustre b2_4 branch, the failure did not occur on Lustre 2.4.1 RC2.
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            By searching on Maloo, I found that test fsx passed on FC18 on Lustre b2_4 build #40 and previous builds. Builds #41, #42, #43 were not tested on FC18. It seems that the culprit is in build #42.

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - By searching on Maloo, I found that test fsx passed on FC18 on Lustre b2_4 build #40 and previous builds. Builds #41, #42, #43 were not tested on FC18. It seems that the culprit is in build #42.
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Lustre build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/44/ (2.4.1 RC1)
            Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64
            FSTYPE=zfs

            sanity-benchmark test fsx also hit the same failure:
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e004601a-1556-11e3-8938-52540035b04c

            FYI, here is the query result of sanity-benchmark test_fsx with "FAIL" status on Lustre b2_4 branch:
            http://tinyurl.com/kxheu43

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Lustre build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/44/ (2.4.1 RC1) Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64 FSTYPE=zfs sanity-benchmark test fsx also hit the same failure: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e004601a-1556-11e3-8938-52540035b04c FYI, here is the query result of sanity-benchmark test_fsx with "FAIL" status on Lustre b2_4 branch: http://tinyurl.com/kxheu43

            Sorry, it seems LU-2909 is closed, so presumably this is a new issue.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Sorry, it seems LU-2909 is closed, so presumably this is a new issue.

            This looks related to https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2909 an earlier 2.4 blocker.

            keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - This looks related to https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2909 an earlier 2.4 blocker.

            People

              green Oleg Drokin
              yujian Jian Yu
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: