Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-4282

some OSTs reported as inactive in lfs df, UP with lctl dl, data not accessible

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Blocker
    • None
    • Lustre 2.4.1
    • None
    • MDS and OSS on Lustre 2.4.1, clients lustre 1.8.9, all Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
    • 3
    • 11756

    Description

      As indicated in LU-4242, I now have a problem on our preproduction file system that stops users from accessing the data, servers from cleanly rebooting etc, stopping any further testing.

      After upgrading the servers from 2.3 to 2.4.1 (MDT build #51 of b2_4 from jenkins) our clients can no longer fully access this file system. The clients can mount the file system and can access one OST on each of the two OSSes, but the other OSSes are not accessible and are shown as inactive in lfs df output and /proc/fs/lustre/lov/*/target_obd, but are shown as UP in lctl dl.

      [bnh65367@cs04r-sc-serv-07 ~]$ lctl dl |grep play01
       91 UP lov play01-clilov-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 4
       92 UP mdc play01-MDT0000-mdc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
       93 UP osc play01-OST0000-osc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
       94 UP osc play01-OST0001-osc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
       95 UP osc play01-OST0002-osc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
       96 UP osc play01-OST0003-osc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
       97 UP osc play01-OST0004-osc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
       98 UP osc play01-OST0005-osc-ffff810076ae2000 9186608e-d432-283c-0e6e-47b800427d3e 5
      [bnh65367@cs04r-sc-serv-07 ~]$ lfs df /mnt/play01
      UUID                   1K-blocks        Used   Available Use% Mounted on
      play01-MDT0000_UUID     78636320     3502948    75133372   4% /mnt/play01[MDT:0]
      play01-OST0000_UUID   7691221300  4506865920  3184355380  59% /mnt/play01[OST:0]
      play01-OST0001_UUID   7691221300  3765688064  3925533236  49% /mnt/play01[OST:1]
      play01-OST0002_UUID : inactive device
      play01-OST0003_UUID : inactive device
      play01-OST0004_UUID : inactive device
      play01-OST0005_UUID : inactive device
      
      filesystem summary:  15382442600  8272553984  7109888616  54% /mnt/play01
      
      [bnh65367@cs04r-sc-serv-07 ~]$ cat /proc/fs/lustre/lov/play01-clilov-ffff810076ae2000/target_obd 
      0: play01-OST0000_UUID ACTIVE
      1: play01-OST0001_UUID ACTIVE
      2: play01-OST0002_UUID INACTIVE
      3: play01-OST0003_UUID INACTIVE
      4: play01-OST0004_UUID INACTIVE
      5: play01-OST0005_UUID INACTIVE
      

      As expected the fail-over OSS for each OST does see connection attempts and reports (correctly) that that OST is not available on this OSS.

      I have confirmed that the OSTs are mounted on the OSSes correctly.

      For the other client that I have tried to bring back the situation is similar but the OSTs that are inactive are slightly different:

      [bnh65367@cs04r-sc-serv-06 ~]$ lfs df /mnt/play01
      UUID                   1K-blocks        Used   Available Use% Mounted on
      play01-MDT0000_UUID     78636320     3502948    75133372   4% /mnt/play01[MDT:0]
      play01-OST0000_UUID : inactive device
      play01-OST0001_UUID   7691221300  3765688064  3925533236  49% /mnt/play01[OST:1]
      play01-OST0002_UUID   7691221300  1763305508  5927915792  23% /mnt/play01[OST:2]
      play01-OST0003_UUID : inactive device
      play01-OST0004_UUID : inactive device
      play01-OST0005_UUID : inactive device
      
      filesystem summary:  15382442600  5528993572  9853449028  36% /mnt/play01
      
      [bnh65367@cs04r-sc-serv-06 ~]$ 
      

      play01-OST0000, play01-OST0002, play01-OST0004 are on one OSS
      play01-OST0001, play01-OST0003, play01-OST0005 are on a different OSS (but all on the same).

      I have tested the network, don't see any errors, lnet_selftest between the clients and the OSSes works at line rate at least for the first client (1GigE client...), nothing obvious on the second client either.

      For completeness I should probably mention that all the servers (MDS and OSSes) have changed IP addresses at the same time as the upgrade, I have verified the information is correctly changed on the targets, both clients have been rebooted multiple times since the IP address change, without any changes.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              mdiep Minh Diep
              ferner Frederik Ferner (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: