Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Major
-
None
-
Lustre 2.4.1
-
None
-
RHEL6.4/distro OFED/1.8.9 clients/2.4.1 servers
-
3
-
11939
Description
We have 2 separate 1.8.9 clients that have processes hung in the D state with the clients endlessly looping from FULL to DISCONN and then reestablishing connectivity. One appears to be looping on a Bulk IO write to a stale file handle (10.36.202.142@o2ib) and the other appears to be a BULK IO read from a kiblnd failure (10.36.202.138@o2ib). The timeouts affect filesystem availability, but other activities proceed in between these disconnections.
Just yesterday we identified 2 bad IB cables with high symbol error rates in our fabric that have since been disconnected. They were likely the cause for at least one of the issues.
server logs relevant to 10.36.202.138@o2ib issue:
Dec 8 12:11:52 atlas-oss3b4 kernel: [1032387.863173] Lustre: atlas2-OST009b: Client 3b57a9ed-bec6-9b0d-7da8-04d696e1a7f2 (at 10.36.202.138@o2ib) refused reconnection, still busy with 1 active RPCs
Dec 8 12:11:52 atlas-oss3b4 kernel: [1032387.919690] LustreError: 11590:0:(ldlm_lib.c:2711:target_bulk_io()) @@@ Reconnect on bulk PUT req@ffff880761cd2800 x1453425689933409/t0(0) o3->3b57a9ed-bec6-9b0d-7da8-04d696e1a7f2@10.36.202.138@o2ib:0/0 lens 448/432 e 0 to 0 dl 1386523292 ref 1 fl Interpret:/2/0 rc 0/0
Dec 8 12:11:52 atlas-oss3b4 kernel: [1032388.030434] Lustre: atlas2-OST009b: Bulk IO read error with 3b57a9ed-bec6-9b0d-7da8-04d696e1a7f2 (at 10.36.202.138@o2ib), client will retry: rc -110
client log on 10.36.202.138@o2ib:
Dec 8 12:11:51 dtn04.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: LustreError: 24615:0:(events.c:199:client_bulk_callback()) event type 1, status -103, desc ffff880499288000
Dec 8 12:11:52 dtn04.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: 24622:0:(client.c:1529:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request x1453425689933409 sent from atlas2-OST009b-osc-ffff880c392f9400 to NID 10.36.225.185@o2ib 19s ago has failed due to network error (567s prior to deadline).
Dec 8 12:11:52 dtn04.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: 24622:0:(client.c:1529:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) Skipped 7 previous similar messages
Dec 8 12:11:52 dtn04.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: atlas2-OST009b-osc-ffff880c392f9400: Connection to service atlas2-OST009b via nid 10.36.225.185@o2ib was lost; in progress operations using this service will wait for recovery to complete.
Dec 8 12:11:52 dtn04.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: Skipped 7 previous similar messages
Dec 8 12:11:52 dtn04.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred while communicating with 10.36.225.185@o2ib. The ost_connect operation failed with -16
lctl dk output:
00000100:00080000:9:1386522391.428708:0:24622:0:(client.c:1392:ptlrpc_check_set()) resend bulk old x1453425689698153 new x1453425689814678
00000100:02000400:4:1386522391.428708:0:24623:0:(import.c:1016:ptlrpc_connect_interpret()) Server atlas2-OST009b_UUID version (2.4.1.0) is much newer than client version (1.8.9)
00000800:00000100:8:1386522411.140346:0:1644:0:(o2iblnd_cb.c:1813:kiblnd_close_conn_locked()) Closing conn to 10.36.225.185@o2ib: error 0(waiting)
00000100:00020000:6:1386522411.140744:0:24615:0:(events.c:199:client_bulk_callback()) event type 1, status -103, desc ffff880499288000
00000100:00000400:3:1386522411.151303:0:24622:0:(client.c:1529:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request x1453425689814678 sent from atlas2-OST009b-osc-ffff880c392f9400 to NID 10.36.225.185@o2ib 20s ago has failed due to network error (567s prior to deadline).
server logs relevant to 10.36.202.142@o2ib issue:
Dec 8 09:27:15 atlas-oss4h1 kernel: [1022525.123761] LustreError: 113676:0:(ldlm_lib.c:2722:target_bulk_io()) @@@ network error on bulk GET 0(1048576) req@ffff880ff253d000 x145343054
1439222/t0(0) o4->10c57078-ce10-72c6-b97d-e7c9a32a240c@10.36.202.142@o2ib:0/0 lens 448/448 e 0 to 0 dl 1386513410 ref 1 fl Interpret:/2/0 rc 0/0
Dec 8 09:27:15 atlas-oss4h1 kernel: [1022525.123900] Lustre: atlas2-OST03e0: Bulk IO write error with 10c57078-ce10-72c6-b97d-e7c9a32a240c (at 10.36.202.142@o2ib), client will retry:
rc -110
client logs from 10.36.202.142@o2ib:
Dec 8 09:26:50 dtn-sch01.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: atlas2-OST03e0-osc-ffff881039813c00: Connection to service atlas2-OST03e0 via nid 10.36.226.48@o2ib was lost; in progress operati
ons using this service will wait for recovery to complete.
Dec 8 09:26:50 dtn-sch01.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: Skipped 39 previous similar messages
Dec 8 09:26:50 dtn-sch01.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: atlas2-OST03e0-osc-ffff881039813c00: Connection restored to service atlas2-OST03e0 using nid 10.36.226.48@o2ib.
Dec 8 09:26:50 dtn-sch01.ccs.ornl.gov kernel: Lustre: Skipped 41 previous similar messages
The lctl dk output is less revealing for this case, but I will attach it. What flags are desirable for getting more relevant information?
From the OS, if I try to kill the process or stat the inode, I see:
00000080:00020000:3:1386519720.291103:0:16284:0:(file.c:3348:ll_inode_revalidate_fini()) failure -116 inode 144117425485470173
[root@dtn-sch01 ~]# fuser -k -m /lustre/atlas2
Cannot stat file /proc/975/fd/25: Stale file handle
[root@dtn-sch01 ~]# ls -l /proc/975/fd/25
l-wx------ 1 cfuson ccsstaff 64 Dec 7 22:46 /proc/975/fd/25 -> /lustre/atlas1/stf007/scratch/cfuson/TestDir/SubDir2/13G-3.tar
[root@dtn-sch01 ~]#
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
-
- Resolved
-
Activity
Evicting the client from from the OST the it is connect cycling with will cause an LBUG
<3>LustreError: 167-0: This client was evicted by atlas2-OST009b; in progress operations using this service will fail.
<0>LustreError: 2405:0:(osc_request.c:2357:brw_interpret()) ASSERTION(!(aa->aa_oa->o_valid & OBD_MD_FLHANDLE)) failed
<3>LustreError: 17528:0:(rw.c:1339:ll_issue_page_read()) page ffffea001ba4b0d0 map ffff880839a9aa30 index 0 flags c0000000000821 count 5 priv ffff880822484d80: read queue failed: rc -5
<0>LustreError: 2405:0:(osc_request.c:2357:brw_interpret()) LBUG
<4>Pid: 2405, comm: ptlrpcd
<4>
<4>Call Trace:
<1>BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
<1>IP: [<(null)>] (null)
<4>PGD 81984f067 PUD 8392fc067 PMD 0
<4>Oops: 0010 1 SMP
<4>last sysfs file: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI000D:00/power1_average_interval
<4>CPU 10
<4>Modules linked in: iptable_nat nf_nat mptctl mptbase nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl mgc(U) lustre(U) lov(U) mdc(U) lquota(U) osc(U) ptl
rpc(U) obdclass(U) lvfs(U) ko2iblnd(U) lnet(U) libcfs(U) autofs4 sunrpc nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ipt_REJECT xt_comment nf_c
onntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_ucm ib_uverbs ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_add
r ipv6 tcp_bic power_meter sg mlx4_ib ib_sa ib_mad ib_core mlx4_en mlx4_core hpilo hpwdt bnx2 myri10ge(U) dca microcode serio_raw k10temp amd64_e
dac_mod edac_core edac_mce_amd i2c_piix4 shpchp ext4 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif hpsa pata_acpi ata_generic pata_atiixp ahci radeon ttm drm_km
s_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
<4>
<4>Pid: 2405, comm: ptlrpcd Not tainted 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64 #1 HP ProLiant DL385 G7
<4>RIP: 0010:[<0000000000000000>] [<(null)>] (null)
<4>RSP: 0018:ffff88041b9ddb48 EFLAGS: 00010246
<4>RAX: ffff88041b9ddbac RBX: ffff88041b9ddba0 RCX: ffffffffa0558260
<4>RDX: ffff88041b9ddbe0 RSI: ffff88041b9ddba0 RDI: ffff88041b9dc000
<4>RBP: ffff88041b9ddbe0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
<4>R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000000cbe0
<4>R13: ffffffffa0558260 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88044e483fc0
<4>FS: 00007f0e92ef9700(0000) GS:ffff88044e480000(0000) knlGS:00000000f77026c0
<4>CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
<4>CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000815d93000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
<4>DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
<4>DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
<4>Process ptlrpcd (pid: 2405, threadinfo ffff88041b9dc000, task ffff880438ed3500)
<4>Stack:
<4> ffffffff8100e4a0 ffff88041b9ddbac ffff880438ed3500 ffffffffa07cdf78
<4><d> 00000000a07ce9a8 ffff88041b9dc000 ffff88041b9ddfd8 ffff88041b9dc000
<4><d> 000000000000000a ffff88044e480000 ffff88041b9ddbe0 ffff88041b9ddbb0
<4>Call Trace:
<4> [<ffffffff8100e4a0>] ? dump_trace+0x190/0x3b0
<4> [<ffffffffa054c835>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
<4> [<ffffffffa054ce65>] lbug_with_loc+0x75/0xe0 [libcfs]
<4> [<ffffffffa05555d6>] libcfs_assertion_failed+0x66/0x70 [libcfs]
<4> [<ffffffffa07c43ff>] brw_interpret+0xcff/0xe90 [osc]
<4> [<ffffffff810097cc>] ? __switch_to+0x1ac/0x320
<4> [<ffffffff8105ea69>] ? find_busiest_queue+0x69/0x150
<4> [<ffffffffa0702a9a>] ptlrpc_check_set+0x24a/0x16b0 [ptlrpc]
<4> [<ffffffff81081b5b>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x7b/0xe0
<4> [<ffffffff81081be2>] ? del_timer_sync+0x22/0x30
<4> [<ffffffffa07397ad>] ptlrpcd_check+0x18d/0x270 [ptlrpc]
<4> [<ffffffffa0739a50>] ptlrpcd+0x160/0x270 [ptlrpc]
<4> [<ffffffff81063990>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
<4> [<ffffffff8100c0ca>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
<4> [<ffffffffa07398f0>] ? ptlrpcd+0x0/0x270 [ptlrpc]
<4> [<ffffffff8100c0c0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
<4>Code: Bad RIP value.
<1>RIP [<(null)>] (null)
<4> RSP <ffff88041b9ddb48>
<4>CR2: 0000000000000000
Unfortunately, the issue is still present independent of the IB hardware.
I'm unsure what contributed to the string of tests succeeding, but we are now back in the same pattern of reconnects on many different 1.8.9 clients. When this happens, processes that access the filesystem remain in the D state and the log messages given above repeat.
I believe the best way to pick this up is to try the 2.4 client on identical hardware to compare, and then also a LNET selftest on a dedicated client. We would have to deal with other activity on the server, but if I read Liang's comment correctly, the worry is client activity.
As an update to this case, we tried running the rsync test with a lustre 1.8.9 client, but on an FDR ConnectX-3 card and could not reproduce the issue. Right now it appears to be an issue with the IB card or associated driver. It does not appear to be a lustre issue.
This is happening with 1.8 clients. I looked at the LU-793 patch to see if I could back port it and give it a try. The problem is target_bulk_io doesn't even exist in 1.8!!! I'm not that familiar with 1.8 internals to do a proper back port of this magnitude.
I'm afraid it might not be very helpful to try selftest if there is other activity on the client, it's better to have a "neat" run to diagnose network issue.
Niu, could it relate to LU-793? the patch is already in master but not in 2.4 releases.
Thanks for the suggestion. We are open to trying lnet selftest, but while the system is in production, we would expect other client activity to servers mentioned here to interfere with the lnet selftest and vice versa. Do you expect that we'd see an issue at a low concurrency setting such that we wouldn't be subject to contention from other clients. If so, then the results will be meaningful. If not, we will need to wait 2 weeks before we have an interval where we can perform isolated testing. Please advise.
Was there heavy load on servers when the bulk io timeout is seen? If the the problem always happen no matter of server load, I would think a low concurrency testing is meaningful.
Another thought to address whether their is an an issue with the network:
verify issue is still present with selected client running 1.8.9 client
run rsync application across a large directory such that objects from every OST are read/written.
upgrade selected client to 2.4.1
repeat rsync test and look for any signs of network lossWhat to look for:
When the issue with the 1.8.9 clients occurs, it is very obvious based on the number of Lustre error messages in our server logs. I'd consider the lack of these messages to be a sign of successful test.
Yes, I think this way can help us to see if it's a network or Lustre version problem.
Hi Niu,
Thanks for the suggestion. We are open to trying lnet selftest, but while the system is in production, we would expect other client activity to servers mentioned here to interfere with the lnet selftest and vice versa. Do you expect that we'd see an issue at a low concurrency setting such that we wouldn't be subject to contention from other clients. If so, then the results will be meaningful. If not, we will need to wait 2 weeks before we have an interval where we can perform isolated testing. Please advise.
Another thought to address whether their is an an issue with the network:
- verify issue is still present with selected client running 1.8.9 client
- run rsync application across a large directory such that objects from every OST are read/written.
- upgrade selected client to 2.4.1
- repeat rsync test and look for any signs of network loss
What to look for:
When the issue with the 1.8.9 clients occurs, it is very obvious based on the number of Lustre error messages in our server logs. I'd consider the lack of these messages to be a sign of successful test.
Would this be useful or is it too high level?
Could you run lnet-selftest to check the network between problematic OST and 1.8 clients?
I just posted the instructions of how to use lnet-selftest here and the wrapper script is attached:
= Preparation =
The LNET Selftest kernel module must be installed and loaded on all targets in the test before the application is started. Identify the set of all systems that will participate in a session and ensure that the kernel module has been loaded. To load the kernel module:
modprobe lnet_selftest
Dependencies are automatically resolved and loaded by modprobe. This will make sure all the necessary modules are loaded: libcfs, lnet, lnet_selftest and any one of the klnds (kernel lustre network devices, i.e. ksocklnd, ko2iblnd, etc.).
Identify a "console" node from which to conduct the tests. This is the single system from which all LNET selftest commands will be executed. The console node owns the LNET selftest session and there should be only one active session on the network at any given time (strictly speaking one can run several LNET selftest sessions in parallel across a network but this is generally discouraged unless the sessions are carefully isolated).
It is strongly recommended that a survey and analysis of raw network performance between the target systems is carried out prior to running the LNET selftest benchmark. This will help to identify and measure any performance overhead introduced by LNET. The HPDD SE team has recently been evaluating Netperf for this purpose on TCP/IP-based networks with good results. Refer to the HPDD SE Netperf page for details on how to manage this exercise.
= Using the Wrapper Script =
Use the LNET Selftest wrapper to execute the test cases referenced in this document. The header of the script has some variables that need to be set in accordance with the target environment. Without changes, the script is very unlikely to operate correctly, if at all. Here is a listing of the header:
Single Client Throughput – LNET Selftest Read (2 Nodes, 1:1)
Used to establish point to point unidirectional read performance between two nodes.
Set the wrapper up as follows:
#Output file ST=lst-output-$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M:%S) # Concurrency CN=32 #Size SZ=1M # Length of time to run test (secs) TM=60 # Which BRW test to run (read or write) BRW=read # Checksum calculation (simple or full) CKSUM=simple # The LST "from" list -- e.g. Lustre clients. Space separated list of NIDs. LFROM="10.73.2.21@tcp" # The LST "to" list -- e.g. Lustre servers. Space separated list of NIDs. LTO="10.73.2.22@tcp"
CN: the concurrency setting simulates the number of threads performing communication. The LNET Selftest default is 1, which is not enough to properly exercise the connection. Set to at least 16, but experiment with higher values (32 or 64 being reasonable choices).
SZ: the size setting determines the size of the IO transaction. For bandwidth (throughput) measurements, use 1M.
TM: test time in seconds– how long to run the benchmark for. Set to a reasonable number in order to ensure collection of sufficient data to extrapolate a meaningful average (at least 60 seconds).
BRW: The Bulk Read/Write test to use. There are only two choices "read" or "write".
CKSUM: The checksum checking method. Choose either "simple" or "full".
LFROM: a space-separated list of NIDs that represent the "from" list (or source) in LNET Selftest. This is often a set of clients.
LTO: a space-separated list of NIDs that represent the "to" list (or destination) in LNET Selftest. This is often a set of servers.
Change the LFROM and LTO lists as required.
Run the script several times, changing the concurrency setting with at the start of every new run. Use the sequence 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128. Modify the output filename for each run so that it is clear what results have been captured into each file.
The test cases in this LU are all with clients on the same NI as the servers – no routers.
Strangely this is only on our 1.8.9 systems. 2.4 clients can access these files without issue and a test writing to files striped on each OST in the filesystem run to completion. The same test on a 1.8.9 client will hang on OST0024 as noted above.
Do you use different router for 1.8 & 2.4 clients?
Liang, is there any simple way to check if the network between client and server is sane? Could you advise?
The ASSERTION(!(aa->aa_oa->o_valid & OBD_MD_FLHANDLE)) in brw_interpret was introduced by
LU-2703.Hongchao, could you take a look? What's the intention of this assert?