Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-4701 LFSCK phase II technical debts
  3. LU-4763

sanity-scrub test 11: FAIL: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped on mds1, but got 14

Details

    • 13100

    Description

      sanity-scrub test 11 failed as follows:

      CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 3 -r
      Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000.
      CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
      CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
      CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 -r
      Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000.
      CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
      CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
       sanity-scrub test_11: @@@@@@ FAIL: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped on mds1, but got 14 
      

      Maloo report: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/764fa658-aa3d-11e3-b4b1-52540035b04c

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-4763] sanity-scrub test 11: FAIL: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped on mds1, but got 14
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Lustre client build: https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_4/73 (2.4.3)
            Lustre server build: https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_5/86 (2.5.3 RC1)

            The similar failure occurred:

            CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 -r
            Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000.
            CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
            CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
            CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 -r
            Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000.
            CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
            CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
             sanity-scrub test_11: @@@@@@ FAIL: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped, but got 14 
            

            Maloo report: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1a2c41ce-31dd-11e4-bd90-5254006e85c2

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Lustre client build: https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_4/73 (2.4.3) Lustre server build: https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_5/86 (2.5.3 RC1) The similar failure occurred: CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 -r Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000. CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 -r Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000. CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub CMD: shadow-13vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub sanity-scrub test_11: @@@@@@ FAIL: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped, but got 14 Maloo report: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1a2c41ce-31dd-11e4-bd90-5254006e85c2

            Fix was landed as part of LU-4556.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Fix was landed as part of LU-4556 .

            The patch has been landed to master.

            yong.fan nasf (Inactive) added a comment - The patch has been landed to master.

            The fixing is contained in the patch:
            http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/9704/

            yong.fan nasf (Inactive) added a comment - The fixing is contained in the patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/9704/

            I will enhance the test scripts in the task of optimising the sanity-lfsck/sanity-scrub.

            yong.fan nasf (Inactive) added a comment - I will enhance the test scripts in the task of optimising the sanity-lfsck/sanity-scrub.

            I suspect that there are some new files created during test_14 repeat the scrub, so the test scripts should be improved to check the total checked the objects (files) to guarantee the compare "noscrub" between two cycle OI scrub are the same.

            yong.fan nasf (Inactive) added a comment - I suspect that there are some new files created during test_14 repeat the scrub, so the test scripts should be improved to check the total checked the objects (files) to guarantee the compare "noscrub" between two cycle OI scrub are the same.
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Here is a patch trying to reproduce the failure on Lustre b2_5 build #41: http://review.whamcloud.com/9645

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Here is a patch trying to reproduce the failure on Lustre b2_5 build #41: http://review.whamcloud.com/9645

            People

              yong.fan nasf (Inactive)
              yujian Jian Yu
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: