[LU-5658] sanity test_17n: destroy remote dir error 0

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Duplicate
• Priority: Critical
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.7.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Di Wang
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for Amir Shehata <[e-mail]>

Seeing the following errors:

LustreError: 11-0: MGC10.1.4.222@tcp: Communicating with 10.1.4.222@tcp, operation obd_ping failed with -107.
LustreError: 166-1: MGC10.1.4.222@tcp: Connection to MGS (at 10.1.4.222@tcp) was lost; in progress operations using this service will fail
LustreError: 8827:0:(mgc_request.c:517:do_requeue()) failed processing log: -5

LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0001-mdc-ffff88007981bc00: Communicating with 10.1.4.218@tcp, operation mds_statfs failed with -107.
LustreError: Skipped 1 previous similar message
Lustre: lustre-MDT0001-mdc-ffff88007981bc00: Connection to lustre-MDT0001 (at 10.1.4.218@tcp) was lost; in progress operations using this service will wait for recovery to complete
LustreError: 4138:0:(client.c:2802:ptlrpc_replay_interpret()) @@@ status 301, old was 0  req@ffff880079cf9000 x1479964115341320/t4294967394(4294967394) o101->lustre-MDT0001-mdc-ffff88007981bc00@10.1.4.218@tcp:12/10 lens 592/544 e 0 to 0 dl 1411404116 ref 2 fl Interpret:RP/4/0 rc 301/301

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c65731d8-42b4-11e4-b87c-5254006e85c2.

Comments

[nasf (Inactive)]

Another failure instance:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/83f29682-5ec7-11e4-a2a3-5254006e85c2

[Jinshan Xiong (Inactive)]

new occurrence: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/21a318ac-54f0-11e4-92b6-5254006e85c2

[Di Wang]

Andreas, I just update the patch, please have a look.

[Andreas Dilger]

Do, can you please look into why this patch is failing conf-sanity? That is preventing it from landing:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/d2739d04-50c8-11e4-aa89-5254006e85c2
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/18ef3062-50de-11e4-ac0f-5254006e85c2

[Di Wang]

Duplicate with LU-5420.

[Di Wang]

Hmm, we probably should retry for mgc, instead of failing mgc in step 2. So the fix for LU-5420( http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/11258/) should fix the issue.