Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Critical
-
Lustre 2.7.0, Lustre 2.8.0, Lustre 2.5.4
-
3
-
16613
Description
This issue was created by maloo for John Hammond <john.hammond@intel.com>
This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/01943f56-7150-11e4-b80a-5254006e85c2.
The sub-test test_39k failed with the following error:
mtime is lost on close: 1416505386, should be 1384969360
I ran 39k in a loop locally and saw the same failure in 2 out of 256 runs.
Here are all the instances from maloo:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/7e8dab70-069d-11e2-9e80-52540035b04c ~2012-09-24
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/9f92a846-0c4e-11e2-8132-52540035b04c ~2012-10-01
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/bed3a506-06c6-11e4-9c81-5254006e85c2 2014-07-08 01:42:48 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/127d427e-0c86-11e4-8fe6-5254006e85c2 2014-07-15 21:43:59 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/ab1c3752-2a76-11e4-8657-5254006e85c2 2014-08-23 00:04:17 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/1791dfdc-6d01-11e4-8bd3-5254006e85c2 2014-11-14 08:35:54 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/545725c0-6db6-11e4-a728-5254006e85c2 2014-11-15 20:02:55 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/9c2721d8-7078-11e4-a6ba-5254006e85c2 2014-11-19 16:37:26 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/bb99d730-712d-11e4-9495-5254006e85c2 2014-11-20 17:12:53 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/2a99b35e-7150-11e4-b80a-5254006e85c2 2014-11-20 17:12:53 UTCs
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/1db886d4-7177-11e4-89a9-5254006e85c2 2014-11-21 00:07:35 UTCs
Info required for matching: sanity 39k
Attachments
Issue Links
- is blocking
-
LU-3289 IU Shared Secret Key authentication and encryption
-
- Resolved
-
- is related to
-
LU-6831 The ticket for tracking all DNE2 bugs
-
- Reopened
-
-
LU-7252 replay-single test_116b:process_req_last_xid()) LBUG
-
- Resolved
-
-
LU-7182 LBUG during key reestablishment with GSS clients
-
- Resolved
-
- is related to
-
LU-5006 chown/chgrp doesn't work for files created by lfs setstripe
-
- Resolved
-
-
LU-5319 Support multiple slots per client in last_rcvd file
-
- Resolved
-
It isn't totally clear that we need the change from http://review.whamcloud.com/14793 in order for the multi-slot code to work. While it would make the tracking of unreplied RPCs a bit more complex, having an atomic XID assignment set at "send" time is not quite the same as "unreplied" so there still needs to be a mechanism used to track which RPCs have replies.
The one major difference would be that there needs to be some mechanism to track RPC XIDs which are never sent, so that they don't permanently get stuck as the lowest unreplied XID. It would seem possible to do this in __ptlrpc_req_free() I think?