Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Blocker
-
None
-
Lustre 2.7.0
-
None
-
1
-
9223372036854775807
Description
This evening we have hit this LBUG on the MDT in our production file system, the file system is currently down as we hit the same bug every time we attempt to bring the MDT back, as soon as recovery finishes.
<0>LustreError: 722:0:(osd_handler.c:1017:osd_trans_start()) ASSERTION( get_current()->journal_info == ((void *)0) ) failed: <0>LustreError: 722:0:(osd_handler.c:1017:osd_trans_start()) LBUG <4>Pid: 722, comm: mdt01_017 <4> <4>Call Trace: <4> [<ffffffffa065f895>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs] <4> [<ffffffffa065fe97>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs] <4> [<ffffffffa17df24d>] osd_trans_start+0x25d/0x660 [osd_ldiskfs] <4> [<ffffffffa09b9b4a>] llog_osd_destroy+0x42a/0xd40 [obdclass] <4> [<ffffffffa09b2edc>] llog_cat_new_log+0x1ec/0x710 [obdclass] <4> [<ffffffffa09b350a>] llog_cat_add_rec+0x10a/0x450 [obdclass] <4> [<ffffffffa09ab1e9>] llog_add+0x89/0x1c0 [obdclass] <4> [<ffffffffa17f1976>] ? osd_attr_set+0x166/0x460 [osd_ldiskfs] <4> [<ffffffffa0d914e2>] mdd_changelog_store+0x122/0x290 [mdd] <4> [<ffffffffa0da4d0c>] mdd_changelog_data_store+0x16c/0x320 [mdd] <4> [<ffffffffa0dad9b3>] mdd_attr_set+0x12f3/0x1730 [mdd] <4> [<ffffffffa088a551>] mdt_reint_setattr+0xf81/0x13a0 [mdt] <4> [<ffffffffa087be1c>] ? mdt_root_squash+0x2c/0x3f0 [mdt] <4> [<ffffffffa08801dd>] mdt_reint_rec+0x5d/0x200 [mdt] <4> [<ffffffffa086423b>] mdt_reint_internal+0x4cb/0x7a0 [mdt] <4> [<ffffffffa08649ab>] mdt_reint+0x6b/0x120 [mdt] <4> [<ffffffffa0c6f56e>] tgt_request_handle+0x8be/0x1000 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa0c1f5a1>] ptlrpc_main+0xe41/0x1960 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffff8106c4f0>] ? pick_next_task_fair+0xd0/0x130 <4> [<ffffffffa0c1e760>] ? ptlrpc_main+0x0/0x1960 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffff8109e66e>] kthread+0x9e/0xc0 <4> [<ffffffff8100c20a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20 <4> [<ffffffff8109e5d0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xc0 <4> [<ffffffff8100c200>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 <4> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
The stack trace doesn't quite seem to be the same as for LU-6634 (which anyway doesn't have any fix suggested.)
Alex,
could you double check the bug number that this is a duplicate of?
LU-6636doesn't look right, did you meanLU-6634?Also, what would be the best way we can get a fix/patch for lustre 2.7?
Cheers,
Frederik