[LU-7541] rpm build failed in 2.7.1

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Critical
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.7.0
• Environment: centos 7.1.
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Jian Yu
• Reporter: Jay Lan (Inactive)

Description

When building lustre-2.7.1 rpms in a centos 7.1 chroot environment, the build failed:

...
if test -d "lustre-2.7.1"; then find "lustre-2.7.1" -type d ! -perm -200 -exec chmod u+w {} ';' && rm -rf "lustre-2.7.1" ||

{ sleep 5 && rm -rf "lustre-2.7.1"; }

; else :; fi
rpmbuilddir=`mktemp t -d rpmbuild-lustre$USER-XXXXXXXX`; \
make \
rpmbuilddir="$rpmbuilddir" rpm-local || exit 1; \
/bin/rpmbuild \
--define "_tmppath $rpmbuilddir/TMP" \
--define "_topdir $rpmbuilddir" \
--define "build_src_rpm 1" \
--define "dist %

{nil}

" \
-ts lustre-2.7.1.tar.gz || exit 1; \
cp $rpmbuilddir/SRPMS/lustre-2.7.1-*.src.rpm . || exit 1; \
rm -rf $rpmbuilddir
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp.chroot/nas-2.7.1-fe'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp.chroot/nas-2.7.1-fe'
sed: can't read /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64/build/include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
error: line 138: Version required: Requires: kernel =
make: *** [srpm] Error 1

I did specify
--with-linux=/usr/src/kernels/${kversion} \
when running `configure`, so the path should be used instead of "/lib/modules/`uname -r`"

Also config.log showed the version.h exists at include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h:
...
configure:13640: checking for /usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.20151203.x86_64.lustre271/include/linux/version.h
configure:13654: result: no
configure:13661: checking for /usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.20151203.x86_64.lustre271/include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
configure:13675: result: yes

I did not have this problem in 2.x.y build up to 2.5.3. Changes made in 2.7 broke my build.

I will attach config.log and log-rpms files.
:q

Issue Links

• is related to: LU-6697 build SRPM target should not depend from kernel sources
• is related to: LU-6001 cleanup build scripts after reorganization

Comments

[Jian Yu]

Patches landed.

[Jay Lan (Inactive)]

Hi Peter,

The above two ported patches did solve my problem.
Please land the patches and close this ticket.

Thanks!
Jay

[Peter Jones]

Jay

Try these two patches that have already been ported to the 2.7 FE branch

LU-6001: http://review.whamcloud.com/17678
LU-6697: http://review.whamcloud.com/17679

Peter

[Jay Lan (Inactive)]

Hi Minh, can you create a patch for 2.7.1?
Thanks!

[Minh Diep]

Jay, please apply this http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/15181/ to see if it fixes