[LU-7550] sanity test_27C: FAIL: Can not find 5 in obdidx 0 1 2 3 4 6

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Major
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.8.0
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.8.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Jian Yu
• Reporter: Jian Yu

Description

sanity test 27C failed as follows:

== sanity test 27C: check full striping across all OSTs == 06:13:56 (1450016036)
obdidx 0 1 2 3 4 6
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh: line 2017: [: obdidx: integer expression expected
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh: line 2017: [: obdidx: integer expression expected
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh: line 2017: [: obdidx: integer expression expected
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh: line 2017: [: obdidx: integer expression expected
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh: line 2017: [: obdidx: integer expression expected
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh: line 2017: [: obdidx: integer expression expected
 sanity test_27C: @@@@@@ FAIL: Can not find 5 in obdidx 0 1 2 3 4 6 

Maloo report:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/86dc5690-a1b9-11e5-b83c-5254006e85c2

Issue Links

• is duplicated by: LU-3001 sanity 27C: error: getstripe failed for f.sanity.27C0
• is related to: LU-6910 Configurable values for OST reserved size

Comments

[Jian Yu]

Patch landed to master branch for Lustre 2.8.0.

[Gerrit Updater]

Oleg Drokin ([e-mail]) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/17691/
Subject: LU-7550 tests: wait OSTs up in check_seq_oid()
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: ef46d32bc5aa713ab55179bd836d750def0022d7

[Gerrit Updater]

Jian Yu ([e-mail]) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/17691
Subject: LU-7550 tests: wait OSTs up in check_seq_oid()
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: eeb8ff65ff75ad902b1702b7b75d63a1ec09c6da

[James Nunez (Inactive)]

Reopening because we are seeing some patches fail due to this error with LU-6910 reverted. Reducing priority since the frequency of this failure is one to two times per day.

[Alexander Boyko]

>So, the failure is a regression introduced by patch http://review.whamcloud.com/15731 for LU-6910.
Looks like it was wrong, a last fails was not based at LU-6910.

[James Nunez (Inactive)]

More failures on master:
2015-12-17 18:15:27 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2ffb7bf0-a504-11e5-b68c-5254006e85c2
2015-12-17 21:23:15 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/21bd6288-a54a-11e5-9f01-5254006e85c2
2015-12-17 21:47:01 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e9ac1898-a53b-11e5-b50c-5254006e85c2
2015-12-19 06:39:50 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/394798f4-a641-11e5-924d-5254006e85c2
2015-12-20 07:49:15 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9a4e3e2e-a730-11e5-b560-5254006e85c2