[LU-8062] recovery-small test_115b: @@@@@@ FAIL: dd success

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Major
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.10.1, Lustre 2.11.0
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.8.0, Lustre 2.9.0, Lustre 2.10.0

Epic/Theme

test

• Severity: 3
• Assignee: WC Triage
• Reporter: Bhagyesh Dudhediya (Inactive)

Description

== recovery-small test 115b: write: late REQ MDunlink and no bulk == 21:12:09 (1461384729)
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
onyx-38vm7@tcp:/lustre
74157152 309236 69890576 1% /mnt/lustre
fail_loc=0x8000051b
fail_val=4
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
onyx-38vm7@tcp:/lustre
74157152 309236 69890576 1% /mnt/lustre
CMD: onyx-38vm8 lctl set_param fail_val=0 fail_loc=0x80000215
fail_val=0
fail_loc=0x80000215
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB) copied, 2.13538 s, 1.9 kB/s
recovery-small test_115b: @@@@@@ FAIL: dd success
Trace dump:
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4764:error()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/recovery-small.sh:2161:test_115_write()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/recovery-small.sh:2181:test_115b()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:5028:run_one()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:5067:run_one_logged()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4914:run_test()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/recovery-small.sh:2183:main()
Dumping lctl log to /logdir/test_logs/2016-04-22/lustre-reviews-el6_7-x86_64-review-dne-part-1-1_6_1_38438_-70130481106820-100010/recovery-small.test_115b.*.1461384732.log

Issue Links

• is duplicated by: LU-8061 recovery-small: short description of the failure
• is related to: LU-8067 sanityn test_31a: read dd: reading `/mnt/lustre2/d31a.sanityn/f31a.sanityn': Input/output error 0 blocks, must be
• is related to: LU-7434 lost bulk leads to a hang

Comments

[Bob Glossman (Inactive)]

another on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7b0a1850-df81-11e6-be8a-5254006e85c2

[nasf (Inactive)]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/91f16c44-c8d4-11e6-8515-5254006e85c2

[nasf (Inactive)]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c1bf78dc-be55-11e6-9f18-5254006e85c2

[Jian Yu]

+1 on master:

https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c78d6572-b396-11e6-85c4-5254006e85c2

[Emoly Liu]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/552d00bc-b663-11e6-b603-5254006e85c2

[nasf (Inactive)]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0cf1f83e-ab7d-11e6-a726-5254006e85c2

[Niu Yawei (Inactive)]

Hit on master: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/3c6bacec-a680-11e6-8859-5254006e85c2

[nasf (Inactive)]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0409e532-a1d3-11e6-9ab0-5254006e85c2

[Jian Yu]

One more failure instance on master branch: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/11d1b22e-5b2b-11e6-b2e2-5254006e85c2

[Niu Yawei (Inactive)]

https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/5766e584-41c7-11e6-bbf5-5254006e85c2

The failure reoccurred in master review.

[Vitaly Fertman]

Andreas Dilger added a comment - 8 hours ago - edited
Closing this bug, since the problematic patch was reverted, and LU-7434 is still open to track the re-landing of the fixed patch.

actually, the fix was submitted above. please re-land the original patch with the fix above.