Details

    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      ZFS master doesn't define DN_MAX_BONUSLEN which is still used by osd-zfs.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-8619] Lustre to build against ZFS 0.7.0

            seeing repeated fails in zfs test runs on this mod. strongly suspect some subtests are in fact version dependent on zfs version. need somebody zfs savvy to analyze the failures.

            only zfs tests fail.

            bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - seeing repeated fails in zfs test runs on this mod. strongly suspect some subtests are in fact version dependent on zfs version. need somebody zfs savvy to analyze the failures. only zfs tests fail.
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            If only someone had predicted that using this ticket to track support for ZFS 0.6.5.8 would be confusing

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - If only someone had predicted that using this ticket to track support for ZFS 0.6.5.8 would be confusing

            why is this ticket shown as Resolved? As far as I can see https://review.whamcloud.com/22569 hasn't landed yet.

            bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - why is this ticket shown as Resolved? As far as I can see https://review.whamcloud.com/22569 hasn't landed yet.

            Ned Bass (bass6@llnl.gov) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26094
            Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.7.0
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 40740639ea6599b4b7583957c295a180f8d2ff1c

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Ned Bass (bass6@llnl.gov) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26094 Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.7.0 Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 40740639ea6599b4b7583957c295a180f8d2ff1c
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            I think that it was a bit confusing to track the landing of support for ZFS 0.6.5.8 under this ticket

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - I think that it was a bit confusing to track the landing of support for ZFS 0.6.5.8 under this ticket

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/22571/
            Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.6.5.8
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: e4dbccca11223b94ea8b7baf006e4cc3987841e0

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/22571/ Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.6.5.8 Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: e4dbccca11223b94ea8b7baf006e4cc3987841e0

            Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/24036
            Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.6.5.8
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_9
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 9dfd0d1f1e845216d9c941b3831e91447f946ed8

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/24036 Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.6.5.8 Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_9 Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 9dfd0d1f1e845216d9c941b3831e91447f946ed8
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            master is now building against 0.7 RC1 so marking this as resolved. Post-GA of 0.7 we will track switching to that release under a new ticket

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - master is now building against 0.7 RC1 so marking this as resolved. Post-GA of 0.7 we will track switching to that release under a new ticket

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/22523/
            Subject: LU-8619 osd: define DN_MAX_BONUSLEN
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 49fc02fb738e9420ab10c5a7d41534c7a55b8ea0

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/22523/ Subject: LU-8619 osd: define DN_MAX_BONUSLEN Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 49fc02fb738e9420ab10c5a7d41534c7a55b8ea0

            Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/22677
            Subject: LU-8619 osd: FBO define DN_MAX_BONUSLEN
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 096ae8062b2d95a8b4b114b31a77c05787ab9f42

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/22677 Subject: LU-8619 osd: FBO define DN_MAX_BONUSLEN Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 096ae8062b2d95a8b4b114b31a77c05787ab9f42

            Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/22571
            Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.6.5.8
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 35a4473103e0bb07edf2388a7b9e3c51f3501a9b

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/22571 Subject: LU-8619 lbuild: update ZFS to use 0.6.5.8 Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 35a4473103e0bb07edf2388a7b9e3c51f3501a9b

            People

              jay Jinshan Xiong (Inactive)
              bzzz Alex Zhuravlev
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: