[LU-9216] Interop: 2.7.0 client fails to mount on ~2.9.53 server

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Blocker
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.10.0
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.10.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Niu Yawei (Inactive)
• Reporter: Nathaniel Clark

Description

Trying to test interop client 2.7.0 and current master (~2.9.53). The client failed to mount.
Server: https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/25853/
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a3ddeed6-0656-11e7-9750-5254006e85c2

client syslog:

Mar 11 11:20:28 trevis-55vm1 kernel: Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mount -t lustre -o user_xattr,flock trevis-55vm7@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
Mar 11 11:20:28 trevis-55vm1 kernel: LustreError: 6140:0:(mgc_request.c:2001:mgc_process_config()) Cannot process recover llog -22
Mar 11 11:20:28 trevis-55vm1 kernel: LustreError: 15b-f: MGC10.9.6.115@tcp: The configuration from log 'lustre-client'failed from the MGS (-22).  Make sure this client and the MGS are running compatible versions of Lustre.
Mar 11 11:20:28 trevis-55vm1 kernel: LustreError: 2274:0:(lov_obd.c:946:lov_cleanup()) lustre-clilov-ffff88007da58000: lov tgt 0 not cleaned! deathrow=0, lovrc=1
Mar 11 11:20:28 trevis-55vm1 kernel: Lustre: Unmounted lustre-client
Mar 11 11:20:28 trevis-55vm1 kernel: LustreError: 6140:0:(obd_mount.c:1339:lustre_fill_super()) Unable to mount  (-22)

Issue Links

• is related to: LU-9081 Don't attach other logs when processing client log for LWP

Comments

[Peter Jones]

Fix landed for 2.10

[Gerrit Updater]

Oleg Drokin ([e-mail]) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/26022/
Subject: LU-9216 config: move config types into lustre_idl.h
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: c7785d49520bdf101cd0b1ea03ee236f66054eb5

[Gerrit Updater]

Niu Yawei ([e-mail]) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26022
Subject: LU-9216 config: move config types into lustre_idl.h
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: 0f0de846ef9d11d70ae2b5bf7b604c27dc6c729f

[Andreas Dilger]

Niu, this looks to be related to your patch. Can you please investigate.

Are these values not checked in wirecheck.c? They should be moved over to lustre_idl.h and added in that case.

[Oleg Drokin]

if they go on the wire, they need to be part of the wirecheck/wiretest (for the future patch)