[LU-10081] ost-pools test_18: test failed to respond and timed out Created: 04/Oct/17 Updated: 05/Oct/17 Resolved: 05/Oct/17 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.11.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | James Casper | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
trevis, full, x86_64 servers, ppc clients |
||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/ba995751-659c-4e63-9b5b-fbf101137b78 Numerous instances of sync D in client dmesg: 04:18:39:[ 7277.288178] sync D 00003fffb5226448 0 2457 2455 0x00000080 04:18:39:[ 7277.288219] Call Trace: 04:18:39:[ 7277.288233] [c00000000529f300] [c0000000014e60a4] nr_cpu_ids+0x0/0x4 (unreliable) 04:18:39:[ 7277.288279] [c00000000529f4d0] [c000000000019634] .__switch_to+0x254/0x460 04:18:39:[ 7277.288318] [c00000000529f580] [c0000000009a9c1c] .__schedule+0x43c/0xb00 04:18:39:[ 7277.288358] [c00000000529f6b0] [c0000000009a5e78] .schedule_timeout+0x398/0x460 04:18:39:[ 7277.288403] [c00000000529f7c0] [c0000000009a9734] .io_schedule+0xc4/0x170 04:18:39:[ 7277.288443] [c00000000529f850] [c0000000009a6098] .bit_wait_io+0x18/0x70 04:18:39:[ 7277.288483] [c00000000529f8d0] [c0000000009a62fc] .__wait_on_bit+0x16c/0x200 04:18:39:[ 7277.288524] [c00000000529f980] [c0000000002501b4] .wait_on_page_bit.constprop.31+0xd4/0xf0 04:18:39:[ 7277.288570] [c00000000529fa30] [c000000000250748] .__filemap_fdatawait_range+0x578/0x610 04:18:39:[ 7277.288617] [c00000000529fb60] [c000000000368998] .sync_inodes_sb+0x1a8/0x260 04:18:39:[ 7277.288656] [c00000000529fc70] [c000000000371c9c] .sync_inodes_one_sb+0x1c/0x30 04:18:39:[ 7277.288702] [c00000000529fce0] [c0000000003243cc] .iterate_supers+0x22c/0x2f0 04:18:39:[ 7277.288743] [c00000000529fda0] [c000000000371fb8] .sys_sync+0x48/0xd0 04:18:39:[ 7277.288782] [c00000000529fe30] [c00000000000a184] system_call+0x38/0xb4 |
| Comments |
| Comment by James Casper [ 05/Oct/17 ] |
|
This looks like a dupe of LU-10082. |