[LU-10136] sanity test_255c: Ladvise test11 failed, 255 Created: 18/Oct/17  Updated: 02/Mar/23  Resolved: 22/Nov/17

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.11.0
Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.11.0

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: James Casper Assignee: Patrick Farrell (Inactive)
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

trevis, interop
servers: CentOS7.4, ldiskfs, branch b2_10, v2.10.1, b30
clients: CentOS7.4, branch master, v2.10.54, b3652


Issue Links:
Related
is related to LU-6179 Lock ahead - Request extent locks fro... Resolved
is related to LU-10443 sanity - test_255c: Ladvise test 13,... Resolved
is related to LU-16608 test 255c failing in GK testing Resolved
Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 9223372036854775807

 Description   

https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/d068307c-c982-4d64-b871-00ca293a1a2a

Note: May be related to LU-10104.

From test_log:

== sanity test 255c: suite of ladvise lockahead tests ==
Starting test test10 at 1507837222
Finishing test test10 at 1507837222
CMD: trevis-5vm7 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n ost.OSS.ost.stats
Starting test test11 at 1507837222
lockahead_test: lockahead_test.c:191: test11: assertion 'advice.lla_lockahead_result == LLA_RESULT_SAME' failed: unexpected extent result: 1
 sanity test_255c: @@@@@@ FAIL: Ladvise test11 failed, 255 
  Trace dump:
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:5289:error()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh:14807:test_255c()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:5565:run_one()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:5604:run_one_logged()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:5451:run_test()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity.sh:14860:main()


 Comments   
Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 18/Oct/17 ]

Patrick - Would you please review and comment on this failure?

Thank you.

Comment by Patrick Farrell (Inactive) [ 18/Oct/17 ]

Sure, I'll take a look at this and the linked issue.

Comment by Patrick Farrell (Inactive) [ 19/Oct/17 ]

Oh, this is interop testing. Yeah, that won't work...

Let's see, how do I exclude this...

Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 19/Oct/17 ]

Patrick Farrell (paf@cray.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/29684
Subject: LU-10136 test: Lockahead test fixes
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: ecff7414cf19e7e1157116f89562023ab2be8fb0

Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 22/Nov/17 ]

Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/29684/
Subject: LU-10136 test: Lockahead test fixes
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: ef3a461acebe0e6e134c13734c0d40a5551fa917

Comment by Peter Jones [ 22/Nov/17 ]

Landed for 2.11

Generated at Sat Feb 10 02:32:22 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.