[LU-10213] o2iblnd: Potential discrepancy when allocating qp Created: 08/Nov/17 Updated: 24/Nov/20 Resolved: 28/Mar/18 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.11.0, Lustre 2.10.7 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Amir Shehata (Inactive) | Assignee: | Amir Shehata (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
patch https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/18347 introduced a bug. Basically you're negotiating the number of fragments and then explicitly setting the max_send_wrs according to that number. This patch introduces the logic where if you fail to allocate the qp then you reduce max_send_wrs by quarter, but that could cause a problem where not enough wrs are available under heavy load, if you're sending multiple fragments. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 29/Nov/17 ] |
|
Amir Shehata (amir.shehata@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30310 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 22/Dec/17 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/30310/ |
| Comment by Joseph Gmitter (Inactive) [ 28/Mar/18 ] |
|
Patch landed to master for 2.11.0 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 07/Jan/19 ] |
|
Minh Diep (mdiep@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/33975 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 19/Jan/19 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/33975/ |
| Comment by Patrick Farrell (Inactive) [ 16/Aug/19 ] |
|
I think we need to revert this from 2.12.x and master before the 2.12.3 and master releases, respectively, to avoid the credits bug. I tried to spin the patch, but I ran in to https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34945/, which depends on this and I don't really understand. Would you be able to generate appropriate revert patches for those branches? |