[LU-10215] disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 is not packaged into test rpm Created: 09/Nov/17 Updated: 10/May/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Oleg Drokin | Assignee: | Sarah Liu |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 not included in th RPM means it's not really being tested in maloo. And of course since it's not being tested, nobody knows it actually fails in conf-sanity test 32b too. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 09/Nov/17 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30002 |
| Comment by Oleg Drokin [ 09/Nov/17 ] |
|
I totally expect this patch to fail - in the debug output we can see the fids changed so probably it was generated on a 32bit system and wrongly marked as 64bit? |
| Comment by Oleg Drokin [ 09/Nov/17 ] |
|
The failute was basically this: DIFF OUTPUT where only fids changed conf-sanity test_32b: @@@@@@ FAIL: list verification failed conf-sanity test_32b: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_32b failed with 1 |
| Comment by Oleg Drokin [ 14/Jan/18 ] |
|
Hm, looks like symlinks processing have changed? The image before and after upgrade has different symlink inode numbers, only symlinks appear to be affected -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2261 1282455365 oddjobd -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2262 1270025191 rsyslog -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2296 1289554952 udev-post -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956452 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956454 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956454 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956455 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956452 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956453 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956453 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956455 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956510 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956511 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956511 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956513 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956510 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956511 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956511 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956513 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2442 1289551139 lvm2-monitor -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2515 1289565046 nscd -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2521 1289557304 sssd Any ideas? |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 20/Feb/20 ] |
|
Assign to Sarah as discussed in the patch. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 10/May/22 ] |
|
"Wei Liu <sarah@whamcloud.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/47281 |