obdfilter_survey_detail
obdfilter_survey_summary
[LU-1023] strange numbers shown in obdfilter-survey Created: 22/Jan/12 Updated: 17/Feb/12 Resolved: 04/Feb/12 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.2.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.2.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Blocker |
| Reporter: | Shuichi Ihara (Inactive) | Assignee: | Di Wang |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Attachments: |
obdfilter_survey_detail
obdfilter_survey_summary
|
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 4750 |
| Description |
|
I'm testing lustre-2.1.54 and quick ran obdfilter-survey on it. The obdfilter-survey could run, but some numbers are strange and some numbers are not working well. (same results on current master branch) Here is obdfilter_survey_<date>_<hostname>.summary. Mon Jan 23 12:07:10 JST 2012 Obdfilter-survey for case=disk from dl02 It always shows ERROR for min and max value, because stats[0] in global values in obdfilter_survey_<date>_<hostname>.detail is always -1. And, here is obdfilter_survey_<date>_<hostname>.detail. 126/128 Total: 637.928552/second difftime (start and end) is zero(0.000000) and return infinity of thread per second, because divided by zero. Also, I saw some very strange numbers on the detail log file. 128/128 Total: 805.908932/second during the test, it sometimes shows unreasonable numbers above. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Di Wang [ 23/Jan/12 ] |
|
Might related with recent mds_survey changes. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 24/Jan/12 ] |
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 04/Feb/12 ] |
|
Landed for 2.2 |
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 17/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = FAILURE
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 17/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = FAILURE
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 17/Feb/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = ABORTED
|
