[LU-10334] Ubuntu1604 client sanity-103a: FAIL: ACL misc test failed Created: 06/Dec/17 Updated: 20/Jan/24 Resolved: 20/Jan/24 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.11.0, Lustre 2.10.2, Lustre 2.10.3, Lustre 2.10.4 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Sarah Liu | Assignee: | James A Simmons |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | ubuntu | ||
| Environment: |
server: 2.10.2 RC1 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
client console [413] $ chmod 750 d -- ok
[414] $ ls -dl d | awk '{print $1}' -- ok
[417] $ getfacl --omit-header d -- failed
user::rwx | user::rwx
user:bin:r-x ? user:daemon:rwx #effective:r-x
user:daemon:rwx #effective:r-x ? user:bin:r-x
group::rwx #effective:r-x | group::rwx #effective:r-x
mask::r-x | mask::r-x
other::--- | other::---
default:user::rwx | default:user::rwx
default:user:bin:r-x ? default:user:daemon:rwx
default:user:daemon:rwx ? default:user:bin:r-x
default:group::rwx | default:group::rwx
default:mask::rwx | default:mask::rwx
default:other::r-x | default:other::r-x
|
[432] $ rmdir d -- ok
103 commands (91 passed, 12 failed)
sanity test_103a: @@@@@@ FAIL: misc test failed
|
| Comments |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 06/Dec/17 ] |
|
Logs for this failure are at: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8432a7b6-da27-11e7-9840-52540065bddc |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 06/Dec/17 ] |
|
I don't think this is a real failure, just the "bin" and "daemon" users are reported in the opposite order. Maybe the test needs to sort the output from getfacl? |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 29/Mar/18 ] |
|
James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31828 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 30/Mar/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31828/ |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 30/Mar/18 ] |
|
This issue has not been fixed, only added to ALWAYS_EXCEPT, so it should NOT be marked resolved for the 2.11 release. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 18/Apr/18 ] |
|
James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/32047 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 03/May/18 ] |
|
John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/32047/ |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 26/Aug/19 ] |
|
|
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 25/Apr/22 ] |
|
The fix is under |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 20/Jan/24 ] |
|
Please use "Resolved" instead of "Closed", as that allows editing some aspects of the ticket, for example removing the always_except marker now that the test is no longer excluded. |