[LU-10699] replace HSM actions llog with an index Created: 22/Feb/18 Updated: 23/Sep/21 Resolved: 09/Jun/21 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | John Hammond | Assignee: | John Hammond |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | hsm | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 22/Feb/18 ] |
|
John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31382 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 22/Feb/18 ] |
|
John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31385 _actions() |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 23/Mar/18 ] |
|
John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31758 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 26/Mar/18 ] |
|
John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31776 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 28/Mar/18 ] |
|
John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31821 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 19/Apr/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31382/ |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 02/May/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31385/ _actions() |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 17/May/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31758/ |
| Comment by Nathan Rutman [ 23/May/20 ] |
|
Is this trying to address LU-9540? |
| Comment by John Hammond [ 27/May/20 ] |
|
It's trying to address several things that are awkward or inefficient due to the use of a catalog for HSM actions. |
| Comment by Aurelien Degremont (Inactive) [ 23/Sep/21 ] |
|
@John Hammond , could you explained why this solution was abandoned? Is there a fundamental flaw in its design? |
| Comment by John Hammond [ 23/Sep/21 ] |
|
> Is there a fundamental flaw in its design? No. An index is better suited than an llog for the access patterns we need to support here. (Just like a RB tree is better than a linked list when ...). But I cannot spend time on this now due to other responsibilities. Anyone who would like to pursue this should feel free to reopen the issue. |