[LU-10826] Regression in LU-9372 on OPA enviroment and no recovery triggered Created: 19/Mar/18 Updated: 24/Jul/18 Resolved: 09/Apr/18 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.12.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Shuichi Ihara (Inactive) | Assignee: | Bruno Faccini (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
master, centos7.4 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Looks like [root@es14k-vm1 ~]# umount -t lustre -a [root@es14k-vm1 ~]# lustre_rmmod [root@es14k-vm1 ~]# vi /etc/modprobe.d/lustre.conf options ptlrpc test_req_buffer_pressure=1 [root@es14k-vm1 ~]# mount -t lustre /dev/ddn/scratch0_ost0000 /lustre/scratch0/ost0000 [root@es14k-vm1 ~]# cat /proc/fs/lustre/obdfilter/scratch0-OST0000/recovery_status status: WAITING_FOR_CLIENTS Never client Reconnected and no lustre recovery triggered |
| Comments |
| Comment by Bruno Faccini (Inactive) [ 19/Mar/18 ] |
|
Hmm, I may have been too restrictive in my I will double-check on a test platform.
|
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 20/Mar/18 ] |
|
Faccini Bruno (bruno.faccini@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31690 |
| Comment by Shuichi Ihara (Inactive) [ 21/Mar/18 ] |
|
Thanks Bruno, patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31690 works and now triggred Lustre recovery. |
| Comment by Bruno Faccini (Inactive) [ 21/Mar/18 ] |
|
Shuichi, I am already looking for a way to auto-tune req_buffers_max based, possibly based on current number of active OSTs/targets, number of connected/to-be-recovered Clients, memory available, ... I also want to check some others options which may help to limit each rqbd-buffer memory footprint (presently allocated in a 32K slab when it size is only 17K (this since patch for
|
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 09/Apr/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31690/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 09/Apr/18 ] |
|
Landed for 2.12 |