[LU-10942] Support for Lustre Servers (ldiskfs backend) on kernel 4.12.8 Created: 23/Apr/18 Updated: 05/Aug/20 Resolved: 04/Jul/19 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.11.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | CEA | Assignee: | DELBARY Gael |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
CentOS 7.4 with kernel 4.12.8 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Epic/Theme: | Kernel, ldiskfs | ||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Some improvements in latest kernel allow to boost Lustre performance (on some workloads we can expect up to 30% better, you can have more details on it if you read this LUG presentation [Lustre osd-ldiskfs on kernel 4.12.8|http://cdn.opensfs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Delbary-Lustre_Server_On_Kernel_4_12_8.pdf] This LU purposes patches to support ldiskfs backend. When we began this work on commit "1defa62a19e71c021ec2cf9fc9e0481e9ab962e0", we needed patches for ldiskfs and osd-ldiskfs. Right now people have done the job for the osd-ldiskfs, i submit only the patches for ldiskfs and some autoconf file (to specify explicitly that's for kernel 4.12.8). Feature is not working: Project_quota |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 24/Apr/18 ] |
|
Gael Is this something that you are working on? Peter |
| Comment by DELBARY Gael [ 24/Apr/18 ] |
|
Hello Peter, Yes we have patches for :
I will try to update this LU with a short description ... Gael |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 29/May/18 ] |
|
DELBARY Gael (gael.delbary@cea.fr) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/32572 |
| Comment by Shuichi Ihara (Inactive) [ 30/May/18 ] |
|
Hello Gael, |
| Comment by DELBARY Gael [ 30/May/18 ] |
|
Hi Shuichi, I think 4.12 will not be a LTS version kernel for Linux distribution! I did the job for this version because it was the latest vanilla when we wanted to improve Lustre performance. Yes i agree, your team can rebase theses patches to support 4.14 or 4.15 kernel. Moreover, it will be nice to wait for some reviewers (to avoid "overwork" on your side). |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Jul/19 ] |
|
We are now several version ahead of this |