[LU-11608] DoM2: inherited DoM component size is not limited Created: 02/Nov/18 Updated: 16/Jan/22 Resolved: 16/Jan/22 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.12.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.16.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Andreas Dilger | Assignee: | Mikhail Pershin |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | DoM2 | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
The DoM component size inherited from a parent or root directory is not limited by the current value of lod.*.dom_stripesize. That means any files created in a directory with a larger DoM layout created before the dom_stripesize is reduced will still be created with the larger DoM component size instead of being limited to dom_stripesize on that MDT: client# lfs setstripe -E 1M -L mdt -E -1 -c 2 /mnt/testfs
mdt# lctl set_param lod.*.lod_stripesize=64K
lod.testfs-MDT0000-mdtlov.dom_stripesize=64K
lod.testfs-MDT0001-mdtlov.dom_stripesize=64K
client# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/testfs/dd.2M bs=1M count=2
client# lfs getstripe /mnt/testfs/dd.2M
/mnt/testfs/dd.2M
lcm_layout_gen: 3
lcm_mirror_count: 1
lcm_entry_count: 2
lcme_id: 1
lcme_mirror_id: 0
lcme_flags: init
lcme_extent.e_start: 0
lcme_extent.e_end: 1048576
lmm_stripe_count: 0
lmm_stripe_size: 1048576
lmm_pattern: mdt
lmm_layout_gen: 0
lmm_stripe_offset: 0
lcme_id: 2
lcme_mirror_id: 0
lcme_flags: init
lcme_extent.e_start: 1048576
lcme_extent.e_end: EOF
lmm_stripe_count: 2
lmm_stripe_size: 1048576
lmm_pattern: raid0
lmm_layout_gen: 0
lmm_stripe_offset: 1
lmm_objects:
- 0: { l_ost_idx: 1, l_fid: [0x100010000:0x6:0x0] }
- 1: { l_ost_idx: 2, l_fid: [0x100020000:0x6:0x0] }
Inherited layouts should also be subject to dom_stripesize limiting on the MDS like lfs setstripe-specified layouts. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 02/Nov/18 ] |
|
PS - should we set lod->lod_dom_max_stripesize = MD_MAX_BRW_SIZE by default instead of hard-coding (1 << 20)? |
| Comment by Mikhail Pershin [ 16/Jan/22 ] |
|
Resolved by |