[LU-11755] Remove redundant LASSERT() in ns_is_{client,server}()

• Status: Resolved
• Project: Lustre
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.11.0
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.13.0, Lustre 2.12.3
• Type: Bug
• Priority: Trivial
• Reporter: Nikitas Angelinas
• Assignee: Nikitas Angelinas
• Resolution: Fixed
• Labels: patch
• Severity: 3

Description

In ns_is_{client,server}(), (ns->ns_client == LDLM_NAMESPACE_CLIENT || ns->ns_client == LDLM_NAMESPACE_SERVER) implies that (!(ns->ns_client & ~(LDLM_NAMESPACE_CLIENT |
LDLM_NAMESPACE_SERVER))) is also true, so the latter LASSERT() could be removed from ns_is_{client,server}().

 

This might be an inconsequential issue. I have not checked if gcc optimizes-out one of the LASSERT()s.

Comments

[Nikitas Angelinas]

Sorry, I meant to say "if gcc optimizes-out the first LASSERT()", in the description.

[Gerrit Updater]

Nikitas Angelinas ([e-mail]) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/33822
Subject: LU-11755 ldlm: remove LASSERT() in ns_is_

{client,server}

()
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: 2fff402f6bd8234f4598ba05b7323939afbd52d0

[Gerrit Updater]

Oleg Drokin ([e-mail]) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/33822/
Subject: LU-11755 ldlm: remove LASSERT() in ns_is_

{client,server}

()
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: 0af247b17619f586702b0ad37f0796bdf783b11c

[Peter Jones]

Landed for 2.13

[Gu Zheng (Inactive)]

Hi  Nikitas Angelinas,

This ticket was opened as a BUG, and patch has link to Cray-bug-id: LUS-6762 (Sorry that I can't access it),  so did you really hit similar bugs? or patch is only a cleanup.

[Nikitas Angelinas]

Hi Gu Zheng,

Sorry, I may have opened this as the wrong type of ticket. We did not hit any bugs related to this; it is only a cleanup. Should it be an improvement instead of a bug ticket?

[Gu Zheng (Inactive)]

Hi  @Nikitas,

I see.

The ticket is closed, just let it go.

I pinged you for that, because we hit a bug on this LASSERT(you patch removed), it's really strange, you know ns->ns_client is only used for namespace type check, and it'll never be changed once inited (new ldlm_namespace), we never hit similar problem before.

[Gerrit Updater]

Minh Diep ([e-mail]) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/35193
Subject: LU-11755 ldlm: remove LASSERT() in ns_is_

{client,server}

()
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: b2_12
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: d31110348f4f264cc3c04a7ada972b35cb01c5d8

[Gerrit Updater]

Oleg Drokin ([e-mail]) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/35193/
Subject: LU-11755 ldlm: remove LASSERT() in ns_is_

{client,server}

()
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: b2_12
Current Patch Set:
Commit: 19aefacda4623fb34b09f499ecf087fcb7b968f5