[LU-1189] restore_lustre_params() needs run on active server nodes Created: 05/Mar/12 Updated: 05/Sep/17 Resolved: 26/Apr/13 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.0, Lustre 2.1.4 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.0, Lustre 2.1.5 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Jian Yu |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 5935 | ||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Minh Diep <mdiep@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8f2e25a2-662c-11e1-92b1-5254004bbbd3. https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8f2e25a2-662c-11e1-92b1-5254004bbbd3 When the last subtest is skipped, the entire test is marked failed even everything else passed |
| Comments |
| Comment by Minh Diep [ 04/Apr/12 ] |
|
I can't reproduce this issue in the lab. I noticed that the failures are on group 'failover'. I wonder if this is specific issue to failover testing |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 21/Dec/12 ] |
|
Lustre Tag: v2_1_4_RC1 The same issue existed: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/064bc9ea-4bb6-11e2-aa80-52540035b04c |
| Comment by Minh Diep [ 09/Jan/13 ] |
|
actually, I found an error after all the subtest completed 09:02:17:PASS 11b (376s) / {lnet,lustre}/mdt/lustre-MDT0000/commit_on_sharing: Found no match I believe the report marked as fail is correct behavior since the error happen outside of any subtest |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 22/Feb/13 ] |
|
The issue occurred in failover configuration. After running replay-vbr test, the active MDS node has been changed, however, restore_lustre_params() still tries to restore the saved params on the original (now inactive) node, which causes the failure. I'll submit a patch. |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 07/Mar/13 ] |
|
Patch for Lustre master branch: http://review.whamcloud.com/5628 |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 26/Apr/13 ] |
Hi Oleg, could you please land the above patch on master branch? The issue in this ticket is affecting the failover testing: |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 26/Apr/13 ] |
|
Landed for 2.1.5 and 2.4 |