[LU-11923] meta_bg conflicts with resize_inode if explicitly specified for a small filesystem Created: 05/Feb/19 Updated: 30/Apr/21 Resolved: 27/Feb/19 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.12.0, Lustre 2.10.6 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.13.0 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Andreas Dilger | Assignee: | Andreas Dilger |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||
| Description |
|
If the meta_bg feature is explicitly specified for a filesystem smaller than 16TB, it causes a format error because the resize_inode feature is automatically enabled by /etc/mke2fs.conf for such filesystems: mkfsoptions='-O meta_bg -E lazy_itable_init=0,lazy_journal_init=0 -J size=1024' --reformat --backfstype=ldiskfs /dev/sdc
device size = 14614528MB
formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/sdc
target name testfs:OST0005
4k blocks 3741319168
options -J size=1024 -I 512 -i 524288 -q -O meta_bg,extents,uninit_bg,mmp,dir_nlink,quota,huge_file,flex_bg -G 256 -E lazy_itable_init=0,lazy_journal_init=0 -F
mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L scrlfs:OST0005 -J size=1024 -I 512 -i 524288 -q -O meta_bg,extents,uninit_bg,mmp,dir_nlink,quota,huge_file,flex_bg -G 256 -E lazy_itable_init=0,lazy_journal_init=0 -F /dev/sdc 3741319168
The resize_inode and meta_bg features are not compatible.
They can not be both enabled simultaneously.
Ideally this should be handled automatically in mke2fs itself, but it is also prudent to fix mkfs.lustre to pass ^resize_inode so that it also works with versions of mke2fs that do not have this fixed. The meta_bg feature should also be enabled automatically for filesystems over 256TiB. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 05/Feb/19 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (adilger@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/34178 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 27/Feb/19 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34178/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 27/Feb/19 ] |
|
Landed for 2.13 |