[LU-12489] Tests marked slow that are not slow (anymore?) Created: 28/Jun/19 Updated: 24/Jul/19 Resolved: 24/Jul/19 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.13.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.13.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Oleg Drokin | Assignee: | Oleg Drokin |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
Looking at the "slow" tests I definitely see soem that are no longer slow due to improvements and whatnot. replay-ost-single tests 8a and 8b marked as slow for zfs with citet time of 30 and 12 minutes, in my testing take 38 and 60 seconds. ost-pools test 23b - only takes60 seconds in my testing both zfs and ldiskfs. test 18 is listed as up to 9 minutes which is not all that long after all? replay-single test 44b - I am not even sure why it's on the SLOW list, it takes 12 seconds on my system and I don't see why it would take any longer looking at the test code itself. Also considering it's the only slow test in replay-single that itself takes 2-2.5 hours to run, even if it really did take 7 minutes, that's a tiny increment to disable. There are certainly much longer tests in that script. sanity-quota test 61 - appears to be failing 100% for me so I am not sure how long it takes when it works, but fails rather quickly today it appears? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 28/Jun/19 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/35367 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 24/Jul/19 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/35367/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 24/Jul/19 ] |
|
Landed for 2.13 |