[LU-1249] lctl set_param debug_mb=10 gives Invalid argument Created: 22/Mar/12 Updated: 26/Aug/12 Resolved: 30/Apr/12 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.3.0, Lustre 2.1.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.3.0, Lustre 2.1.3 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Blocker |
| Reporter: | Frey Alfredsson | Assignee: | Zhenyu Xu |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
RHEL 6.2 with no updates. |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 4639 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Step 1: Install RHEL 6.2 using Platform HPC 3.1. Step 2: Packages installed. Step 3: Computer rebooted. Step 4: Run lctl set_param debug_mb=10 [root@storage000 ~]# cat /proc/sys/lnet/debug_mb This error is reproduced every time after following the steps above. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Frey Alfredsson [ 22/Mar/12 ] |
|
It seems that I need to have lctl set_param debug_mb=24 for this to work. When I ran /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/llmount.sh it automatically tried to use debug_mb=10, that is why it became a problem. |
| Comment by Frey Alfredsson [ 22/Mar/12 ] |
|
This machine has one E5603 CPU with 4 cores. |
| Comment by Johann Lombardi (Inactive) [ 22/Mar/12 ] |
|
I think the llmount issue has been fixed in this ticket in |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 22/Mar/12 ] |
|
The llmount fix is only really in the test scripts and do not fix this problem for users at all. I think that we should make the proc tunable more forgiving - arriving it to the minimal value if a value lower than this is used, and the maximum if a value higher than this is used. At that point it makes sense to also remove the workarounds in the test scripts. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 06/Apr/12 ] |
|
Bobi Could you please look at this one? Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Zhenyu Xu [ 09/Apr/12 ] |
|
patch tracking at http://review.whamcloud.com/2489 |
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 01/Aug/12 ] |
|
http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3509 |