[LU-13112] sanity test 228b fails with “ Fail to df. “ Created: 03/Jan/20 Updated: 26/Oct/21 Resolved: 26/Oct/21 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.14.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | James Nunez (Inactive) | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | arm | ||
| Environment: |
ARM clients |
||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
sanity test_228b fails with “ Fail to df. “ sanity test 228b started failing with this error on 2019-12-25 and only fails for ARM. Looking at the failure at https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/aa1beab0-290c-11ea-adca-52540065bddc, we see ‘df’ fail with Started lustre-MDT0000 df: '/mnt/lustre': No such device sanity test_228b: @@@@@@ FAIL: Fail to df. Looking at the client (vm9) console log, we see an error [ 9064.064496] LustreError: 18300:0:(lmv_obd.c:1261:lmv_statfs()) lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff800065d47800: can't stat MDS #0: rc = -19 [ 9064.715178] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark sanity test_228b: @@@@@@ FAIL: Fail to df. There are several examples of this failure |
| Comments |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 03/Jan/20 ] |
|
James Nunez (jnunez@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/37138 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 20/Jan/20 ] |
|
+1 on master x86_64: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/cf84b726-3b33-11ea-b0f4-52540065bddc |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 19/Oct/20 ] |
|
I checked current test results and 54/54 passed on aarch64 in the past week. |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 21/Jan/21 ] |
|
I've seen this failure once for non-arm testing. The failure is for interop testing, 2.13.0 servers with master (2.14.0) clients, at https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/cac2fa87-490a-4e0e-a724-ac78b7976118 . As Andreas noted above, we aren't seeing this test fail for ARM client testing anymore. The last time we saw this test fail for ARM was on 10 FEB 2020. |
| Comment by Xinliang Liu [ 26/Oct/21 ] |
|
Run 100 times in local Arm all-in-one CentOS 8 environment. All pass, this issue maybe caused/impacted by other test cases.
[root@test-01 tests]# PTLDEBUG=-1 RUNAS_ID="1000" RUNAS_GID=1000 ./auster -i 100 -vsr sanity --only 228b
....
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/74/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (25s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/75/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (23s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/76/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/77/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (23s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/78/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (23s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/79/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (23s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/80/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/81/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/82/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/83/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (23s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/84/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/85/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/86/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/87/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/88/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/89/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (25s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/90/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/91/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/92/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/93/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (34s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/94/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (23s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/95/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/96/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (27s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/97/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/98/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (25s)
/tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930/99/sanity.suite_log.beegfs-test-01.log:39:PASS 228b (24s)
[centos@test-01 test_logs]$ find /tmp/test_logs/2021-10-26/034930 -name ""*suite_log* |xargs grep PASS -rin |wc -l
100
[centos@test-01 test_logs]$
|