[LU-15043] OST spill pools should not allow spill pool loops Created: 28/Sep/21 Updated: 27/Jun/22 Resolved: 27/Jun/22 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.15.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.16.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | James Nunez (Inactive) | Assignee: | Alex Zhuravlev |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Using the latest build of Lustre, 2.14.54_92 build # 4421, I created a spill pool loop and encountered some unexpected behavior. I think we should not allow spill pool loops to be created. Here are more details: # lfs pool_list scratch.pool1 Pool: scratch.pool1 scratch-OST0000_UUID # lfs pool_list scratch.pool2 Pool: scratch.pool2 scratch-OST0001_UUID # lfs pool_list scratch.pool3 Pool: scratch.pool3 scratch-OST0002_UUID Set spill pool and thresholds on both MDSs: mds1# lctl get_param lod.scratch-MDT*.pool.*.spill* lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool1.spill_is_active=1 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool1.spill_target=pool2 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool1.spill_threshold_pct=5 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool2.spill_is_active=1 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool2.spill_target=pool3 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool2.spill_threshold_pct=5 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool3.spill_is_active=1 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool3.spill_target=pool1 lod.scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov.pool.pool3.spill_threshold_pct=5 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool1.spill_is_active=1 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool1.spill_target=pool2 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool1.spill_threshold_pct=5 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool2.spill_is_active=1 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool2.spill_target=pool3 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool2.spill_threshold_pct=5 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool3.spill_is_active=1 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool3.spill_target=pool1 lod.scratch-MDT0002-mdtlov.pool.pool3.spill_threshold_pct=5 We see the following in dmesg on mds1, not on mds2: [ 9046.643396] LustreError: 5659:0:(qmt_pool.c:1390:qmt_pool_add_rem()) add to: can't scratch-QMT0000 scratch-OST0000_UUID pool pool1: rc = -17 [ 9056.957864] LustreError: 5666:0:(qmt_pool.c:1390:qmt_pool_add_rem()) add to: can't scratch-QMT0000 scratch-OST0001_UUID pool pool2: rc = -17 [ 9065.980468] LustreError: 5674:0:(qmt_pool.c:1390:qmt_pool_add_rem()) add to: can't scratch-QMT0000 scratch-OST0002_UUID pool pool3: rc = -17 Create files on specific OST pools: # lfs setstripe -p pool1 -c -1 /lustre/scratch/file1 # lfs getstripe -p /lustre/scratch/file1 pool2 # lfs setstripe -p pool2 -c -1 /lustre/scratch/file2 # lfs getstripe -p /lustre/scratch/file2 pool3 # lfs setstripe -p pool3 -c -1 /lustre/scratch/file3 # lfs getstripe -p /lustre/scratch/file3 pool1 We see the following on MDS0: [10198.677195] Lustre: 1506:0:(lod_pool.c:799:lod_check_and_spill_pool()) scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov: more than 10 levels of pool spill for 'pool1->pool2' [10223.616652] Lustre: 1506:0:(lod_pool.c:799:lod_check_and_spill_pool()) scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov: more than 10 levels of pool spill for 'pool2->pool3' [10234.693511] Lustre: 1538:0:(lod_pool.c:799:lod_check_and_spill_pool()) scratch-MDT0000-mdtlov: more than 10 levels of pool spill for 'pool3->pool1' |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 28/Sep/21 ] |
|
James, the "more than 10 levels of pool spill" logic in the code is to prevent an infinite loop in the kernel as it follows the circular linked list of spill targets. It looks like it stops at the 10th level of pool spilling (3 full loops plus 1), which explains the -p pool1 creating a file in pool2. Detecting a loop at the time spill_target is set should be relatively simple to implement. In lod_spill_target_seq_write() it should first copy the specified target into a temporary buffer, rather than pool_spill_target, and follow the specified target pool until it hits a pool with no spill_target set (the normal case), or the pool_spill_target is the same as pool->pool_name. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 29/Sep/21 ] |
|
"Alex Zhuravlev <bzzz@whamcloud.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/45083 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 29/Sep/21 ] |
|
The qmt_pool_add_rem() message started appearing on 2021-08-18, and there have been a few thousand hits per day. Patches landed on that day are listed below (no other patches landed after 2021-08-10 or before 2021-08-25): $ git log --oneline --before 2021-08-22 --after 2021-08-16 d8204f903a (tag: v2_14_54, tag: 2.14.54) New tag 2.14.54 5220160648 LU-14093 lutf: fix build with gcc10 a205334da5 LU-14903 doc: update lfs-setdirstripe man page 1313cad7a1 LU-14899 ldiskfs: Add 5.4.136 mainline kernel support c44afcfb72 LU-12815 socklnd: set conns_per_peer based on link speed 6e30cd0844 LU-14871 kernel: kernel update RHEL7.9 [3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7] 14b8276e06 LU-14865 utils: llog_reader.c printf type mismatch aa5d081237 LU-9859 lnet: fold lprocfs_call_handler functionality into lnet_debugfs_* e423a0bd7a LU-14787 libcfs: Proved an abstraction for AS_EXITING 76c71a167b LU-14775 kernel: kernel update SLES12 SP5 [4.12.14-122.74.1] 67752f6db2 LU-14773 tests: skip check_network() on working node 024f9303bc LU-14668 lnet: Lock primary NID logic 684943e2d0 LU-14668 lnet: peer state to lock primary nid 16321de596 LU-14661 obdclass: Add peer/peer NI when processing llog ac201366ad LU-14661 lnet: Provide kernel API for adding peers 51350e9b73 LU-14531 osd: serialize access to object vs object destroy a5cbe7883d LU-12815 socklnd: allow dynamic setting of conns_per_peer d13d8158e8 LU-14093 mgc: rework mgc_apply_recover_logs() for gcc10 8dd4488a07 LU-6142 tests: remove iam_ut binary 301d76a711 LU-14876 out: don't connect to busy MDS-MDS export The graph shows occurrences by subtest, it looks like this happens in any subtest that is adding a pool: |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 27/Jun/22 ] |
|
"Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>" merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/45083/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 27/Jun/22 ] |
|
Landed for 2.16 |