[LU-15675] Interop sanity-sec test_27a: fileset not taken into account Created: 22/Mar/22 Updated: 09/Dec/23 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.15.0, Lustre 2.15.3 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Sebastien Buisson |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/09838ea8-8c85-4a92-ba12-775d8994ed12 test_31 failed with the following error: /usr/bin/lfs setquota -u quota_usr -b 13363604 -B 14031784 -i 838864 -I 880807 /mnt/lustre FAILED! In interop testing between master and 2.14 client, sanity-sec test 31 and 35 failed with "Permission denied" in different operations. in test_31 while umount /mnt/lustre 2>&1 | grep -q busy; do
echo /mnt/lustre is still busy, wait one second && sleep 1;
done;
fi
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() lustre file system /mnt/lustre
Output information may be incomplete.
lsof: status error on /mnt/lustre: Permission denied
lsof 4.93.2
latest revision: https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof
in test_35 CMD: onyx-50vm4 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdd.lustre-MDT0000.changelog_users CMD: onyx-50vm4 /usr/sbin/lctl set_param mdd.*.changelog_mask=ALL mdd.lustre-MDT0000.changelog_mask=ALL mkdir: cannot create directory '/mnt/lustre/d35.sanity-sec': Permission denied sanity-sec test_35: @@@@@@ FAIL: failed to mkdir d35.sanity-sec VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 02/Feb/23 ] |
|
Sebastien, it looks like this subtest is failing regularly during interop testing with "fileset not taken into account". Is this something to be concerned about, or something unexpected in the interop testing that should be skipped? Could you please take a look. |
| Comment by Sebastien Buisson [ 03/Feb/23 ] |
|
Yes, this can be due to a missing patch on b2_12, that aims at improving the test. I have ported it: |