[LU-16001] interop between 2.12 and 2.15 Created: 10/Jul/22 Updated: 11/Jul/22 Resolved: 11/Jul/22 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.12.9, Lustre 2.15.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Question/Request | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | SC Admin (Inactive) | Assignee: | Peter Jones |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
x86_64, zfs |
||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
Hi, short version: I don't know if you do interop testing between LTS releases, but it seems like something that could be desirable to make upgrade paths clearer. longer version: the new compute client hardware is planned to be rhel9(alma9/rocky9/whatever) which seems to force us to change to lustre 2.15 as 2.12 doesn't support rhel9. can we keep the lustre servers at 2.12 and still talk to 2.15 clients ok, or do we have to upgrade the servers to 2.15 at the same time we add 2.15 clients? if 2.15 on servers is required, then is rhel7 ok, or rhel8 recommended, or ...? any hints and advice is welcome. FWIW a couple of days ago I briefly booted an alma9 node with git master lustre + 1 rhel9 patch to our 2.12 servers, and didn't notice any problems, but also didn't do much more than boot to root-on-lustre, and ls and df. cheers, |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 10/Jul/22 ] |
|
HI there Yes we do interop testing between LTS versions and we call out the supported interoperability in the changelog - https://wiki.lustre.org/index.php?title=Lustre_2.15.0_Changelog. Using clients for the newer Lustre version with the existing servers in order to get support for more current kernel versions is the most common use case for running in an interoperability configuration. We are actively working on getting RHEL9 client support fully in place for 2.1.5.x releases. There is still some work remaining but this should comfortably be complete by the end of the year. Peter |
| Comment by SC Admin (Inactive) [ 11/Jul/22 ] |
|
Hi Peter, thanks for that. I'd missed that in the changelog. I'm relieved we'll be able to space out the new hardware and client OS changes from the lustre server update effort. phew. please close the ticket. thanks for the quick response. cheers, |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 11/Jul/22 ] |
|
Great news - thanks Robin |