[LU-16421] sanity-flr test_61a: atime: old '1670819992' != new '1670819987'

• Status: Resolved
• Project: Lustre
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.15.2, Lustre 2.15.3, Lustre 2.15.4
• Type: Bug
• Priority: Minor
• Reporter: Maloo
• Assignee: WC Triage
• Resolution: Duplicate
• Severity: 3

Description

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/bc989dd3-8412-4351-afa5-fc0c3e8941e4

test_61a failed with the following error:

/mnt/lustre/d61a.sanity-flr/f61a.sanity-flr: atime: old '1670819992' != new '1670819987'

OSS dmesg

[ 1089.220980] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-flr test 61a: mirror extend and migrate preserve timestamps ========================================================== 04:39:41 (1670819981)
[ 1104.660390] LustreError: 13143:0:(qsd_reint.c:635:qqi_reint_delayed()) lustre-OST0004: Delaying reintegration for qtype:0 until pending updates are flushed.
[ 1105.344930] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark  sanity-flr test_61a: @@@@@@ FAIL: \/mnt\/lustre\/d61a.sanity-flr\/f61a.sanity-flr: atime: old \'1670819992\' != new \'1670819987\' 
[ 1105.724550] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: sanity-flr test_61a: @@@@@@ FAIL: /mnt/lustre/d61a.sanity-flr/f61a.sanity-flr: atime: old '1670819992' != new '1670819987'
[ 1106.206580] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl dk > /autotest/autotest-1/2022-12-11/lustre-b2_15_full-part-1_44_37_844cfca8-fe7a-4931-8b07-b25b8d6ccc2d//sanity-flr.test_61a.debug_log.$(hostname -s).1670819999.log;

VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV
sanity-flr test_61a - /mnt/lustre/d61a.sanity-flr/f61a.sanity-flr: atime: old '1670819992' != new '1670819987'

Issue Links

• duplicates: LU-13578 sanity test_39r: atime on client != ost
• is duplicated by: LU-17265 sanity test_39r: atime on client 1699...

Comments

[Andreas Dilger]

It looks like this subtest has failed about 20 times in the past 3 months.

[Andreas Dilger]

The patch from LU-17265 should likely fix this failure.

[Andreas Dilger]

I believe that this failure is now only being seen in interop testing.