|
"Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@hpe.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/50497
Subject: LU-16697 llite: Set BDI_CAP_* flags for lustre
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: 33896b62aa39e271cdcd4fdc4adb84a3849bdca1
|
|
Shaun,
Check out LU-16680. This solves the problem of Lustre working well with cgroups and general memory pressure without subjecting us to the kernel writeback limits, which were a huge problem in the past:
https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/50460
|
|
Patrick, do you have a reference on previous problems with the kernel writeback limits? I'm wondering if they show tests and/or monitors we could use to usefully test these new patches?
|
|
"Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>" merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/50497/
Subject: LU-16697 llite: Set BDI_CAP_* flags for lustre
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: f5a75ea44db32ac27ada327b4752c3bc611cf9df
|
|
Landed for 2.16
|
Generated at Sat Feb 10 03:29:14 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.