[LU-17094] lfs df -v (verbose) output abnormality Created: 06/Sep/23 Updated: 08/Sep/23 Resolved: 08/Sep/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Arshad Hussain | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Not a Bug | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
Output of lfs df -v outputs the a stale 'f' at the end of each line of device. Is this correct ? What is expected from verbose output? # lfs df -v UUID 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on lustre-MDT0000_UUID 125056 1664 112156 2% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0] f lustre-OST0000_UUID 313104 1388 284556 1% /mnt/lustre[OST:0] f lustre-OST0001_UUID 313104 1388 284556 1% /mnt/lustre[OST:1] f filesystem_summary: 626208 2776 569112 1% /mnt/lustre
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Steve Crusan [ 06/Sep/23 ] |
|
I don't remember when this was added, but that tripped me up awhile ago too. See the lfs-df(1) manpage, but that means it's a non-rotational and/or [f]lash device. |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 06/Sep/23 ] |
|
Steve is correct. There are other possible status flags that might be printed with "-v" as well. What were you expecting from "lfs df -v"? |
| Comment by Arshad Hussain [ 08/Sep/23 ] |
|
I was on leave yesterday, so I could not respond earlier. I don't remember when this was added, but that tripped me up awhile ago too. See the lfs-df(1) manpage, but that means it's a non-rotational and/or [f]lash device. Thanks for pointing this out. I was not aware that target status would be printed this way. I get it now. Steve is correct. There are other possible status flags that might be printed with "-v" as well. What were you expecting from "lfs df -v"? Yes, I could see this under lfs-df (man page). Sorry for the noise. |
| Comment by Arshad Hussain [ 08/Sep/23 ] |
|
Not a bug. See Steve/Andreas comments under ticket. |