[LU-2040] Test failure on test suite mds-survey, subtest test_1 Created: 27/Sep/12  Updated: 19/Apr/13  Resolved: 19/Apr/13

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.4.0

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: Bob Glossman (Inactive)
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: None

Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 4215

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/2f30564a-08f5-11e2-b313-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_1 failed with the following error:

test failed to respond and timed out

Should add version check to skip mds-survey in interop with 2.1<->2.3

02:23:01:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == mds-survey test 1: Metadata survey with zero-stripe == 02:22:55 (1348737775)
02:23:01:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: lctl dl
02:23:01:Lustre: Echo OBD driver; http://www.lustre.org/
02:23:01:LustreError: 19640:0:(mdt_handler.c:5073:mdt_obd_connect()) ASSERTION( env != ((void *)0) ) failed: 
02:23:01:LustreError: 19640:0:(mdt_handler.c:5073:mdt_obd_connect()) LBUG
02:23:01:Pid: 19640, comm: lctl
02:23:01:
02:23:01:Call Trace:
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0bd77f5>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0bd7e07>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa09f63c6>] mdt_obd_connect+0x386/0x440 [mdt]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa090a9fc>] echo_device_alloc+0xa1c/0x14a0 [obdecho]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498a67>] obd_setup+0x1d7/0x2f0 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0484eeb>] ? class_new_export+0x72b/0x960 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498d88>] class_setup+0x208/0x890 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04a08bc>] class_process_config+0xbfc/0x1be0 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa047c49b>] class_handle_ioctl+0x3cb/0x1ed0 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8113ff34>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x1e4/0x2b0
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04692ab>] obd_class_ioctl+0x4b/0x190 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118dff2>] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0xa0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff81039678>] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x58/0xd0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e194>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x84/0x580
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8103876c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20
02:23:01: [<ffffffff81038779>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x9/0x10
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8109c9b0>] ? getnstimeofday+0x60/0xf0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e711>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
02:23:01:
02:23:01:Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
02:23:01:Pid: 19640, comm: lctl Not tainted 2.6.32-279.2.1.el6_lustre.gc46c389.x86_64 #1
02:23:01:Call Trace:
02:23:01: [<ffffffff814fd57a>] ? panic+0xa0/0x168
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0bd7e5b>] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa09f63c6>] ? mdt_obd_connect+0x386/0x440 [mdt]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa090a9fc>] ? echo_device_alloc+0xa1c/0x14a0 [obdecho]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498a67>] ? obd_setup+0x1d7/0x2f0 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0484eeb>] ? class_new_export+0x72b/0x960 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498d88>] ? class_setup+0x208/0x890 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04a08bc>] ? class_process_config+0xbfc/0x1be0 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa047c49b>] ? class_handle_ioctl+0x3cb/0x1ed0 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8113ff34>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x1e4/0x2b0
02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04692ab>] ? obd_class_ioctl+0x4b/0x190 [obdclass]
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118dff2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x22/0xa0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff81039678>] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x58/0xd0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e194>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x84/0x580
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8103876c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20
02:23:01: [<ffffffff81038779>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x9/0x10
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8109c9b0>] ? getnstimeofday+0x60/0xf0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e711>] ? sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
02:23:01: [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b


 Comments   
Comment by Peter Jones [ 27/Sep/12 ]

Bob

Could you please take care of this one? We'll still be supporting interop with 2.1.x for Lustre 2.4 so this is needed for master and perhaps we can add the fix to b2_3 if we need an RC2 for 2.3

Thanks

Peter

Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 28/Sep/12 ]

http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4124 for master

Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Since Change, 4124 has landed to master, can this ticket be closed?

Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Yes, I believe this should be closed.

Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 19/Apr/13 ]

Patch landed

Generated at Sat Feb 10 01:21:51 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.