[LU-2040] Test failure on test suite mds-survey, subtest test_1 Created: 27/Sep/12 Updated: 19/Apr/13 Resolved: 19/Apr/13 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Bob Glossman (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 4215 |
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/2f30564a-08f5-11e2-b313-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_1 failed with the following error:
Should add version check to skip mds-survey in interop with 2.1<->2.3 02:23:01:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == mds-survey test 1: Metadata survey with zero-stripe == 02:22:55 (1348737775) 02:23:01:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: lctl dl 02:23:01:Lustre: Echo OBD driver; http://www.lustre.org/ 02:23:01:LustreError: 19640:0:(mdt_handler.c:5073:mdt_obd_connect()) ASSERTION( env != ((void *)0) ) failed: 02:23:01:LustreError: 19640:0:(mdt_handler.c:5073:mdt_obd_connect()) LBUG 02:23:01:Pid: 19640, comm: lctl 02:23:01: 02:23:01:Call Trace: 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0bd77f5>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0bd7e07>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa09f63c6>] mdt_obd_connect+0x386/0x440 [mdt] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa090a9fc>] echo_device_alloc+0xa1c/0x14a0 [obdecho] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498a67>] obd_setup+0x1d7/0x2f0 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0484eeb>] ? class_new_export+0x72b/0x960 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498d88>] class_setup+0x208/0x890 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04a08bc>] class_process_config+0xbfc/0x1be0 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa047c49b>] class_handle_ioctl+0x3cb/0x1ed0 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8113ff34>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x1e4/0x2b0 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04692ab>] obd_class_ioctl+0x4b/0x190 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118dff2>] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0xa0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff81039678>] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x58/0xd0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e194>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x84/0x580 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8103876c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20 02:23:01: [<ffffffff81038779>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x9/0x10 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8109c9b0>] ? getnstimeofday+0x60/0xf0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e711>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 02:23:01: 02:23:01:Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG 02:23:01:Pid: 19640, comm: lctl Not tainted 2.6.32-279.2.1.el6_lustre.gc46c389.x86_64 #1 02:23:01:Call Trace: 02:23:01: [<ffffffff814fd57a>] ? panic+0xa0/0x168 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0bd7e5b>] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa09f63c6>] ? mdt_obd_connect+0x386/0x440 [mdt] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa090a9fc>] ? echo_device_alloc+0xa1c/0x14a0 [obdecho] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498a67>] ? obd_setup+0x1d7/0x2f0 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0484eeb>] ? class_new_export+0x72b/0x960 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa0498d88>] ? class_setup+0x208/0x890 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04a08bc>] ? class_process_config+0xbfc/0x1be0 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa047c49b>] ? class_handle_ioctl+0x3cb/0x1ed0 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8113ff34>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x1e4/0x2b0 02:23:01: [<ffffffffa04692ab>] ? obd_class_ioctl+0x4b/0x190 [obdclass] 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118dff2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x22/0xa0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff81039678>] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x58/0xd0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e194>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x84/0x580 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8103876c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20 02:23:01: [<ffffffff81038779>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x9/0x10 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8109c9b0>] ? getnstimeofday+0x60/0xf0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8118e711>] ? sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 02:23:01: [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 27/Sep/12 ] |
|
Bob Could you please take care of this one? We'll still be supporting interop with 2.1.x for Lustre 2.4 so this is needed for master and perhaps we can add the fix to b2_3 if we need an RC2 for 2.3 Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 28/Sep/12 ] |
|
http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4124 for master |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 18/Apr/13 ] |
|
Since Change, 4124 has landed to master, can this ticket be closed? |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 18/Apr/13 ] |
|
Yes, I believe this should be closed. |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 19/Apr/13 ] |
|
Patch landed |