[LU-2192] Test failure on test suite conf-sanity, subtest test_61 Created: 16/Oct/12 Updated: 13/Nov/12 Resolved: 13/Nov/12 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Blocker |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Jian Yu |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | zfs | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 5235 |
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Li Wei <liwei@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6f4fd31a-1735-11e2-afe1-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_61 failed with the following error:
Info required for matching: conf-sanity 61 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Li Wei (Inactive) [ 16/Oct/12 ] |
[...] CMD: fat-intel-1vm3 dumpe2fs -h lustre-mdt1/mdt1 2>&1 | grep -q large_xattr CMD: fat-intel-1vm3 dumpe2fs -h lustre-mdt1/mdt1 2>&1 [...] |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 07/Nov/12 ] |
|
The test hung at: +++++ pdsh -t 300 -S -w fat-intel-2 '(PATH=$PATH:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/sbin:/usr/sbin; cd /usr/lib64/lustre/tests; LUSTRE="/usr/lib64/lustre" sh -c "dumpe2fs -h lustre-mdt1/mdt1 2>&1")' +++++ sed 's/^fat-intel-2: //' +++++ return 1 ++++ size= ++++ echo +++ local block_size= +++ size=-68 +++ echo -68 ++ generate_string -68 ++ local size=-68 +++ head -c -68 +++ tr '\0' y # dumpe2fs -h lustre-mdt1/mdt1 dumpe2fs 1.42.3.wc3 (15-Aug-2012) dumpe2fs: No such file or directory while trying to open lustre-mdt1/mdt1 Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. dumpe2fs does not work on zfs server target. |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 07/Nov/12 ] |
|
A patch to improve max_xattr_size() is being created. The test_102ha() in sanity.sh, test_58b(), test_58c() in replay-single.sh and check_xattr() in lustre-rsync-test.sh are also needed to be updated to support working with zfs server target. |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 07/Nov/12 ] |
|
It turns out that we only need improve large_xattr_enabled(). |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 13/Nov/12 ] |
|
Status update: |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 13/Nov/12 ] |
|
The patch was landed on master branch. |