[LU-2446] Update Whamcloud copyright messages to Intel for master branch

• Status: Resolved
• Project: Lustre
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.4.0
• Type: Improvement
• Priority: Blocker
• Reporter: Andreas Dilger
• Assignee: Keith Mannthey (Inactive)
• Resolution: Fixed

Description

In LU-1839 the copyright messages were changed in the b2_3 branch, but apparently this was never done for the master branch. We need to run the build/updatecw.sh script on the master branch

Comments

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

The 2.3 changes were never cherry picked into Master.

As I did this for the 2.3 release I will do it for Master.

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4811 Is for the script itself. This is a direct port from the b2_3 work.

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

At this time the following files report that they have no copyright:

libcfs/include/libcfs/libcfs_crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/include/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/include/libcfs/list.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/include/libcfs/posix/posix-crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/include/libcfs/user-crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/include/libcfs/user-mem.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto-adler.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto-crc32.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/posix/posix-adler.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/posix/posix-crc32.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/posix/rbtree.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
libcfs/libcfs/user-crypto.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
lustre/contrib/packet-lustre.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
lustre/liblustre/llite_cl.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
lustre/tests/fsx.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **
lustre/utils/gss/context_lucid.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **

Some of these files have "Other" valid copyrights, some are without the GPL or any copyright and some have valid Whamcloud/Intel commits that we can Intel Copyright against.

As we are working in Master it seems to be a good time to deal with these corner cases.

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

http://review.whamcloud.com/4812 Initial Bulk Change.

Note: These changes are all Txt changes in the comment section, conflicts should be low. If it has problems landing it can be broken up.

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

Another full round of patches has been submitted. A third patch for manual updates has been included: http://review.whamcloud.com/4948

All the above No Copyright issues have been dealt with appropriately.

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

All patches have landed in Master and Copyrights are current for Master.

[Andreas Dilger]

Note that we'll have to re-run the script to update copyright messages for 2013 before the 2.4 release is made, but that can wait until we are closer to the release in March or so.

[Keith Mannthey (Inactive)]

I agree with this. A carefully timed update at the end will work great. This this large update done the final update should be easier to review and land.

Do we want to land a final copyright patch after RC1 or before RC1 for 2.4?

[Peter Jones]

I would say before - our intention with any release candidate should be that it could be released as-is.