[LU-2687] create conf-sanity.sh test_32 ZFS upgrade test image Created: 27/Jan/13  Updated: 05/Jun/15  Resolved: 20/Feb/14

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.4.0
Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.5.1

Type: Bug Priority: Blocker
Reporter: Andreas Dilger Assignee: Sarah Liu
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: MB, zfs

Issue Links:
Blocker
is blocked by LU-4406 conf-sanity test_32a: Upgrade from b2... Closed
Related
is related to LU-3349 Add b2_3/b2_4 ldisk image tarball for... Resolved
is related to LU-4543 Failure on test suite conf-sanity tes... Resolved
is related to LU-4074 Failure on test suite conf-sanity tes... Resolved
Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 6276

 Description   

In order to ensure that we do not break ZFS upgrades in the future, a filesystem test image is needed for conf-sanity.sh test_32a.



 Comments   
Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 27/Jan/13 ]

Adding Li Wei, since he wrote the original test_32newtarball() script.

Comment by Li Wei (Inactive) [ 27/Jan/13 ]

My understanding is that images should be created with releases (e.g., 2.1.1, 2.4.0, etc.) but not development tags (e.g., 2.3.59, 2.4.0-rc3). Having too many images checked in would grow the size of the Git repository and, if I understand correctly, they would be difficult to get ride of, given the version control nature. Hence, I think Andreas wants a ZFS image from the final 2.4.0 release tag, unless he explicitly requests otherwise.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 27/Jan/13 ]

Correct - we only want a single image per release tag. However, since LLNL is already running in production with the current development tag, it would be good to create the disk2_4-zfs.tar.bz2 test image in advance of the release to ensure that we don't break anything in the run-up to the final 2.4.0 release. If there is a well-understood reason to break compatibility with the development code, we can always create a new image, but if we accidentally break compatibility and don't know about it that would is a problem we could avoid.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 21/Jun/13 ]

Emoly, Sarah, I think one of you were working on this already? Is this a duplicate bug with another one where you are doing your work?

Comment by Emoly Liu [ 21/Jun/13 ]

Maybe Sarah is working on this. Is there anything I can help with?

Comment by Sarah Liu [ 26/Jun/13 ]

I will work on this. I've create b2_3 image, but not for zfs.

Comment by Sarah Liu [ 31/Jul/13 ]

http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7193/

Comment by Peter Jones [ 20/Feb/14 ]

Landed for 2.5.1 and 2.6

Generated at Sat Feb 10 01:27:21 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.