[LU-2879] Interop 2.1.4<-> 2.4 failure on test suite parallel-scale-nfsv4 test_iorssf: Cannot remove the directory, not empty Created: 26/Feb/13 Updated: 05/Mar/13 Resolved: 05/Mar/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Blocker |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | LB | ||
| Environment: |
server: 2.1.4 RHEL6 |
||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 6954 |
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/209fe5b4-7d85-11e2-85d0-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_iorssf failed with the following error:
test log shows: [client-27vm6.lab.whamcloud.com:26008] 3 more processes have sent help message help-mpi-btl-base.txt / btl:no-nics [client-27vm6.lab.whamcloud.com:26008] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to see all help / error messages Commencing read performance test. Fri Feb 22 21:05:29 2013 Operation Max (MiB) Min (MiB) Mean (MiB) Std Dev Max (OPs) Min (OPs) Mean (OPs) Std Dev Mean (s) Op grep #Tasks tPN reps fPP reord reordoff reordrand seed segcnt blksiz xsize aggsize --------- --------- --------- ---------- ------- --------- --------- ---------- ------- -------- write 12.69 12.69 12.69 0.00 6.34 6.34 6.34 0.00 322.81006 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1073741824 2097152 4294967296 -1 POSIX EXCEL read 10.07 10.07 10.07 0.00 5.04 5.04 5.04 0.00 406.73381 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1073741824 2097152 4294967296 -1 POSIX EXCEL Max Write: 12.69 MiB/sec (13.30 MB/sec) Max Read: 10.07 MiB/sec (10.56 MB/sec) Run finished: Fri Feb 22 21:12:16 2013 rm: cannot remove `/mnt/lustre/d0.ior.ssf': Directory not empty parallel-scale-nfsv4 test_iorssf: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_iorssf failed with 1 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 27/Feb/13 ] |
|
Hi Hongchao, Is this a duplicate of LU-1639? Thanks. |
| Comment by Hongchao Zhang [ 04/Mar/13 ] |
|
Yes， this is a duplicate of LU-1639 |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 05/Mar/13 ] |
|
Duplicate of LU-1639 per Hongchao. |