[LU-2964] lustre build fails on sles11sp2 Created: 14/Mar/13 Updated: 29/Jan/22 Resolved: 29/Jan/22 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Bob Glossman (Inactive) | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
sles11sp2, 3.0 kernel |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 7228 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Recent commit d7ac66d2fddc3b2a6fb91b6421f9a15b80c8d10a, CC [M] /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/lvfs/fsfilt-ldiskfs.o /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/lvfs/fsfilt-ldiskfs.c:518: error: conflicting types for ‘ldiskfs_map_inode_page’ /home/bogl/lustre-release/ldiskfs/ldiskfs/ldiskfs.h:2022: error: previous declaration of ‘ldiskfs_map_inode_page’ was here make[8]: *** [/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/lvfs/fsfilt-ldiskfs.o] Error 1 rm /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/lvfs/fsfilt-ldiskfs.c make[7]: *** [/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/lvfs] Error 2 make[6]: *** [/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre] Error 2 make[5]: *** [_module_/home/bogl/lustre-release] Error 2 make[4]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-3.0.58-0.6.6-obj/x86_64/default' make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bogl/lustre-release' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bogl/lustre-release' make: *** [all] Error 2 The new added call to ldiskfs_map_inode_page() takes 5 args in the 3.0 kernel in sles11sp2, not the 4 args used in the 2.6 kernel. Needs some autoconf mods and #ifdefs to adapt to different kernel versions. I suspect the build on the 3.7 kernel in FC18 may be broken too. This isn't a critical bug right now because we don't routinely enable server builds on sles11sp2 yet. |
| Comments |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 14/Mar/13 ] |
|
Yep. I posted a patch last night to address this. http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5708. Need to do redo the patch tho in a better way as you can see from andreas comments. |
| Comment by Cory Spitz [ 30/May/18 ] |
|
Old issue; it should probably be closed. |