[LU-334] Lustre client procfs stats: it is valuable to distinguish between client fs cache hits and misses. Created: 17/May/11 Updated: 27/Mar/12 Resolved: 02/Nov/11 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Richard Henwood (Inactive) | Assignee: | Robert Read (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 4870 |
| Description |
|
The Lustre client has a cache. File reads may be serviced by this |
| Comments |
| Comment by Richard Henwood (Inactive) [ 10/Aug/11 ] |
|
A proposed use case for collecting cache miss stats in the llite layer is: Characterizing work-load on low memory clients.Our filesystem has many thousand OSTs. Memory is allocated on the clients for stats collection for each OSC. We would like to disable OSC stats collection entirely on our clients but still record the number of bytes that travel across the wire, and the number that are read from caches on the client. |
| Comment by Richard Henwood (Inactive) [ 12/Sep/11 ] |
|
patch available here: |
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = FAILURE
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 27/Oct/11 ] |
|
Integrated in . (Revision 07c6f609d37878ce0d308a129a0f3ae967d6197b) Result = SUCCESS
|