[LU-3764] sanity test_116a: stripe QOS didn't balance free space Created: 15/Aug/13 Updated: 07/Jul/17 Resolved: 23/Dec/13 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.5.0, Lustre 2.6.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.5.1, Lustre 2.10.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | James Nunez (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | mn4 | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9696 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for girish <gshilamkar@ddn.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/d8c6d5b4-0537-11e3-925a-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_116a failed with the following error:
Info required for matching: sanity 116a |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 29/Aug/13 ] |
|
Another instance: |
| Comment by John Hammond [ 11/Sep/13 ] |
|
This test uses error_ignore so according to the test author's wishes it shouldn't be counted as a failure. Note that it uses error_ignore incorrectly since it only passes one argument. But used correctly or not, calling error_ignore causes the test framework to interpret the test as a failed. |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 11/Sep/13 ] |
|
The incorrect call to error_ignore is fixed, with a fake bugzilla bug number, in the patch for |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 14/Sep/13 ] |
|
Calling error_ignore with two arguments, interpreted as a bug number and a comment, stops the error message "error() without useful message, please fix", but it does not stop the test framework system from classifying the test status as a failure. The problem is that error_noexit writes the comment sent to error_ignore to the LOGDIR/err file. If there is an err file, the pass routine assumes the test failed and reports the test status as FAIL. So, for errors that should be ignored, we probably don't want to be writing the comment out to the err file. Maybe the ignore message should be written out to an ignore file? |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 26/Sep/13 ] |
|
Proposed patch at: http://review.whamcloud.com/7782 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 08/Oct/13 ] |
|
Another minor patch to clean up the code style of test_116a: http://review.whamcloud.com/7882 |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 11/Oct/13 ] |
|
another: |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 25/Oct/13 ] |
|
Landed to master |
| Comment by Dmitry Eremin (Inactive) [ 22/Nov/13 ] |
|
This bug prevents testing in b2_5. We need it in b2_5. https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/846cc906-4817-11e3-9f6d-52540035b04c |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 07/Dec/13 ] |
|
Thanks to Dmitry, patch for b2_5 at http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8395/ |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 17/Apr/14 ] |
|
backport to b2_4 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 24/Jan/17 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/7882/ |