[LU-4342] Test failure on test suite sanity-lfsck, subtest test_6a Created: 03/Dec/13  Updated: 04/Dec/14  Resolved: 04/Dec/14

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.6.0
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: Niu Yawei (Inactive)
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Votes: 0
Labels: None

Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 11883

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for Di Wang <di.wang@whamcloud.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/00456694-5c4c-11e3-9d08-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_6a failed with the following error:

test failed to respond and timed out, and this happens with my patch, but the patch does not change anything of this. So it is probably some issues already exists in master.

23:40:23:LustreError: 14531:0:(qsd_handler.c:1136:qsd_op_adjust()) ASSERTION( qqi ) failed: 
23:40:25:LustreError: 14531:0:(qsd_handler.c:1136:qsd_op_adjust()) LBUG
23:40:25:Pid: 14531, comm: umount
23:40:25:
23:40:26:Call Trace:
23:40:26: [<ffffffffa05f6895>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
23:40:27: [<ffffffffa05f6e97>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
23:40:28: [<ffffffffa0d984e8>] qsd_op_adjust+0x478/0x580 [lquota]
23:40:28: [<ffffffff8119db8d>] ? generic_drop_inode+0x1d/0x80
23:40:29: [<ffffffffa0de5237>] osd_object_delete+0x217/0x2f0 [osd_ldiskfs]
23:40:29: [<ffffffffa072a319>] lu_object_free+0x89/0x1b0 [obdclass]
23:40:30: [<ffffffffa060bb52>] ? cfs_hash_bd_from_key+0x42/0xd0 [libcfs]
23:40:31: [<ffffffffa072aa8d>] lu_object_put+0xad/0x330 [obdclass]
23:40:32: [<ffffffffa0d878ed>] qsd_qtype_fini+0xdd/0x3a0 [lquota]
23:40:33: [<ffffffffa0d87f11>] qsd_fini+0xd1/0x460 [lquota]
23:40:33: [<ffffffffa0dd6c78>] osd_shutdown+0x38/0xe0 [osd_ldiskfs]
23:40:35: [<ffffffffa0de3c3d>] osd_process_config+0x14d/0x1a0 [osd_ldiskfs]
23:40:35: [<ffffffffa0fa8809>] lod_process_config+0x2b9/0xc70 [lod]
23:40:35: [<ffffffffa072b7bb>] ? lu_site_purge+0x23b/0x4a0 [obdclass]
23:40:37: [<ffffffff811685ac>] ? __kmalloc+0x20c/0x220
23:40:37: [<ffffffffa1029930>] mdd_process_config+0x210/0x5e0 [mdd]
23:40:39: [<ffffffffa0ed9fb3>] ? lustre_cfg_new+0x2d3/0x6e0 [mdt]
23:40:39: [<ffffffffa0eda536>] mdt_stack_fini+0x176/0xb90 [mdt]
23:40:41: [<ffffffffa1028475>] ? mdd_init_capa_ctxt+0xf5/0x130 [mdd]
23:40:42: [<ffffffffa0edb5a8>] mdt_device_fini+0x658/0xda0 [mdt]
23:40:43: [<ffffffffa0719b73>] class_cleanup+0x573/0xd30 [obdclass]
23:40:44: [<ffffffffa06f6f26>] ? class_name2dev+0x56/0xe0 [obdclass]
23:40:44: [<ffffffffa071b89a>] class_process_config+0x156a/0x1ad0 [obdclass]
23:40:46: [<ffffffffa0714393>] ? lustre_cfg_new+0x2d3/0x6e0 [obdclass]
23:40:46: [<ffffffffa071bf77>] class_manual_cleanup+0x177/0x6f0 [obdclass]
23:40:48: [<ffffffffa06f6f26>] ? class_name2dev+0x56/0xe0 [obdclass]
23:40:48: [<ffffffffa0756c1c>] server_put_super+0x5ec/0xf60 [obdclass]
23:40:49: [<ffffffff8118366b>] generic_shutdown_super+0x5b/0xe0
23:40:51: [<ffffffff81183756>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x60
23:40:51: [<ffffffffa071de26>] lustre_kill_super+0x36/0x60 [obdclass]
23:40:53: [<ffffffff81183ef7>] deactivate_super+0x57/0x80
23:40:53: [<ffffffff811a21ef>] mntput_no_expire+0xbf/0x110
23:40:55: [<ffffffff811a2c5b>] sys_umount+0x7b/0x3a0
23:40:57: [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Info required for matching: sanity-lfsck 6a



 Comments   
Comment by Peter Jones [ 09/Dec/13 ]

Niu

Could you please comment on this one?

Peter

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 22/Apr/14 ]

Moving this off 2.6.0, since it hasn't been reported since the initial test failure.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 04/Dec/14 ]

Closing this since we haven't seen it in a long time.

Generated at Sat Feb 10 01:41:51 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.