[LU-4350] Failure on test suite parallel-scale test_write_disjoint: ASSERTION( cl_lock_is_mutexed(child) ) failed Created: 05/Dec/13 Updated: 18/Jun/14 Resolved: 18/Jun/14 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.6.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Critical |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Jinshan Xiong (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
lustre-master build #1791 RHEL6 ldiskfs |
||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 11917 |
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/48ece26c-5d39-11e3-8d08-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_write_disjoint failed with the following error:
client console shows: 23:53:20:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == parallel-scale test write_disjoint: write_disjoint == 23:40:38 (1386142838) 23:53:20:LustreError: 27701:0:(lov_lock.c:216:lov_sublock_lock()) ASSERTION( cl_lock_is_mutexed(child) ) failed: 23:53:20:LustreError: 27701:0:(lov_lock.c:216:lov_sublock_lock()) LBUG 23:53:21:Pid: 27701, comm: write_disjoint 23:53:21: 23:53:21:Call Trace: 23:53:21: [<ffffffffa03be895>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs] 23:53:22: [<ffffffffa03bee97>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs] 23:53:22: [<ffffffffa0a56248>] lov_sublock_lock+0x238/0x2c0 [lov] 23:53:22: [<ffffffffa0a57b8b>] lov_lock_enqueue+0x17b/0x850 [lov] 23:53:22: [<ffffffffa0538647>] ? cl_lock_state_signal+0x87/0x160 [obdclass] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa053c00c>] cl_enqueue_try+0xfc/0x300 [obdclass] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa053d25f>] cl_enqueue_locked+0x6f/0x1f0 [obdclass] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa053deae>] cl_lock_request+0x7e/0x270 [obdclass] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa0542e8c>] cl_io_lock+0x3cc/0x560 [obdclass] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa05430c2>] cl_io_loop+0xa2/0x1b0 [obdclass] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa0b03436>] ll_file_io_generic+0x2b6/0x710 [lustre] 23:53:23: [<ffffffffa0532789>] ? cl_env_get+0x29/0x350 [obdclass] 23:53:24: [<ffffffffa0b04102>] ll_file_aio_write+0x142/0x2c0 [lustre] 23:53:24: [<ffffffffa0b043ec>] ll_file_write+0x16c/0x2a0 [lustre] 23:53:24: [<ffffffff81181398>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1a0 23:53:24: [<ffffffff81181c91>] sys_write+0x51/0x90 23:53:25: [<ffffffff810dc685>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290 23:53:25: [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 23:53:25: 23:53:25:Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG 23:53:25:Pid: 27701, comm: write_disjoint Not tainted 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64 #1 23:53:26:Call Trace: 23:53:26: [<ffffffff8150daac>] ? panic+0xa7/0x16f 23:53:26: [<ffffffffa03beeeb>] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs] 23:53:26: [<ffffffffa0a56248>] ? lov_sublock_lock+0x238/0x2c0 [lov] 23:53:27: [<ffffffffa0a57b8b>] ? lov_lock_enqueue+0x17b/0x850 [lov] 23:53:27: [<ffffffffa0538647>] ? cl_lock_state_signal+0x87/0x160 [obdclass] 23:53:27: [<ffffffffa053c00c>] ? cl_enqueue_try+0xfc/0x300 [obdclass] 23:53:27: [<ffffffffa053d25f>] ? cl_enqueue_locked+0x6f/0x1f0 [obdclass] 23:53:27: [<ffffffffa053deae>] ? cl_lock_request+0x7e/0x270 [obdclass] 23:53:28: [<ffffffffa0542e8c>] ? cl_io_lock+0x3cc/0x560 [obdclass] 23:53:28: [<ffffffffa05430c2>] ? cl_io_loop+0xa2/0x1b0 [obdclass] 23:53:28: [<ffffffffa0b03436>] ? ll_file_io_generic+0x2b6/0x710 [lustre] 23:53:28: [<ffffffffa0532789>] ? cl_env_get+0x29/0x350 [obdclass] 23:53:29: [<ffffffffa0b04102>] ? ll_file_aio_write+0x142/0x2c0 [lustre] 23:53:29: [<ffffffffa0b043ec>] ? ll_file_write+0x16c/0x2a0 [lustre] 23:53:29: [<ffffffff81181398>] ? vfs_write+0xb8/0x1a0 23:53:29: [<ffffffff81181c91>] ? sys_write+0x51/0x90 23:53:29: [<ffffffff810dc685>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290 23:53:29: [<ffffffff8100b072>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 23:53:29:Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset 23:53:30:Initializing cgroup subsys cpu |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 09/Dec/13 ] |
|
Jinshan Could you please comment on this one? Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 04/Mar/14 ] |
|
Please reopen this ticket if the issue reoccurs. |