[LU-4417] Failure on test suite sanity-lfsck test_13: ASSERTION( offset < LUSTRE_MAX_OPCODES )

• Status: Closed
• Project: Lustre
• Type: Bug
• Priority: Minor
• Reporter: Maloo
• Assignee: nasf (Inactive)
• Resolution: Won't Fix
• Severity: 3

Description

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7b5ec0d6-6edb-11e3-9dbc-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_13 failed with the following error:

test failed to respond and timed out

MDS2 console shows:

19:27:13:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-lfsck test 13: LFSCK can repair crashed lmm_oi == 19:26:48 (1388114808)
19:27:13:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: grep -c /mnt/mds2' ' /proc/mounts
19:27:13:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: umount -d -f /mnt/mds2
19:27:13:LustreError: 13910:0:(lproc_ptlrpc.c:175:ll_opcode2str()) ASSERTION( offset < LUSTRE_MAX_OPCODES ) failed: offset 4294967295 >= LUSTRE_MAX_OPCODES 87
19:27:13:LustreError: 13910:0:(lproc_ptlrpc.c:175:ll_opcode2str()) LBUG
19:27:13:Pid: 13910, comm: lfsck_layout
19:27:13:
19:27:13:Call Trace:
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa0757895>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa0757e97>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa12803b1>] ll_opcode2str+0x131/0x140 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa124b8e1>] after_reply+0x8b1/0xda0 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa1250781>] ptlrpc_check_set+0xf71/0x1b40 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffff810811e0>] ? process_timeout+0x0/0x10
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa125165a>] ptlrpc_set_wait+0x30a/0x860 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffff81063990>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa1669a60>] ? lfsck_layout_master_async_interpret+0x0/0x430 [lfsck]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa166dce9>] lfsck_layout_master_query_others+0x509/0x600 [lfsck]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa1674ba7>] lfsck_layout_assistant+0x847/0x15b0 [lfsck]
19:27:13: [<ffffffff81063990>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa1674360>] ? lfsck_layout_assistant+0x0/0x15b0 [lfsck]
19:27:13: [<ffffffff81096a36>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
19:27:13: [<ffffffff8100c0ca>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
19:27:13: [<ffffffff810969a0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
19:27:13: [<ffffffff8100c0c0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
19:27:13:
19:27:13:Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
19:27:13:Pid: 13910, comm: lfsck_layout Not tainted 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6_lustre.g2851e84.x86_64 #1
19:27:13:Call Trace:
19:27:13: [<ffffffff8150deec>] ? panic+0xa7/0x16f
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa0757eeb>] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa12803b1>] ? ll_opcode2str+0x131/0x140 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa124b8e1>] ? after_reply+0x8b1/0xda0 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffffa1250781>] ? ptlrpc_check_set+0xf71/0x1b40 [ptlrpc]
19:27:13: [<ffffffff810811e0>] ? process_timeout+0x0/0x10
19:27:14: [<ffffffffa125165a>] ? ptlrpc_set_wait+0x30a/0x860 [ptlrpc]
19:27:14: [<ffffffff81063990>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
19:27:14: [<ffffffffa1669a60>] ? lfsck_layout_master_async_interpret+0x0/0x430 [lfsck]
19:27:14: [<ffffffffa166dce9>] ? lfsck_layout_master_query_others+0x509/0x600 [lfsck]
19:27:14: [<ffffffffa1674ba7>] ? lfsck_layout_assistant+0x847/0x15b0 [lfsck]
19:27:14: [<ffffffff81063990>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
19:27:14: [<ffffffffa1674360>] ? lfsck_layout_assistant+0x0/0x15b0 [lfsck]
19:27:14: [<ffffffff81096a36>] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
19:27:14: [<ffffffff8100c0ca>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
19:27:14: [<ffffffff810969a0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
19:27:14: [<ffffffff8100c0c0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
19:27:14:Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
19:27:14:Initializing cgroup subsys cpu

Comments

[Andreas Dilger]

Looks like a bug in the LFSCK patch series ?

[Sarah Liu]

Hi Andreas, yes it is in the patch series and I will close it now, thanks.

[Sarah Liu]

this is a bug in patch #7524

[nasf (Inactive)]

It is an known LFSCK bug in the patch http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8623/4, I will resubmit patch to fix it.