[LU-4425] Test failure on test suite conf-sanity, subtest test_28 Created: 02/Jan/14 Updated: 16/May/14 Resolved: 16/May/14 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 12154 |
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/55b7cddc-7304-11e3-9955-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_28 failed with the following error:
Info required for matching: conf-sanity 28 |
| Comments |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 02/Jan/14 ] |
|
To repeat what was posted on Test conf-sanity 28 fails 4% of time with the following error. LustreError: 18595:0:(lproc_llite.c:367:ll_max_read_ahead_whole_mb_seq_write()) can't set max_read_ahead_whole_mb more than max_read_ahead_per_file_mb: 0 Looking at the code this means the variable ra_max_pages is being set to zero. Looking at llite_lib.c pages = si.totalram - si.totalhigh; so for some reason si_meminfo() is reporting no free memory. Possible idea is for test 28 to set max_readahead_per_file_mb before the test start since this is the reason for the test fails. |
| Comment by Keith Mannthey (Inactive) [ 02/Jan/14 ] |
|
meminfo can report 0 memory if memory is exhausted. Memory is a limited resource and the kernel keeps the last little bit protected. Are there any other signs of memory pressure on the system? |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 09/Jan/14 ] |
|
Is there any correlation between the test failures and running on SLES clients? I'm wondering if there is any chance that this could be related to seq_file changes somehow? |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 09/Jan/14 ] |
|
This is showing up with an earlier patch for 7290. Waiting to see if the new patch has this problem still. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 21/Jan/14 ] |
|
This problems seems to have gone away. We can close this ticket if that is the case but can be reopen if the problem appears again. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Feb/14 ] |
|
Does this problem still happen? If not can we close this ticket. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 16/May/14 ] |
|
llite proc bug no longer shows up. Peter you can close this ticket. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 16/May/14 ] |
|
As you wish |